Skip to main content
STP710S-D66-Nsh+ vs STP505S-H54-Nfb+ 6 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Suntech STP710S-D66-Nsh+ vs Suntech STP505S-H54-Nfb+

Suntech STP710S-D66-Nsh+
STP710S-D66-Nsh+
710 Wp 22.86 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
Suntech STP505S-H54-Nfb+
STP505S-H54-Nfb+
505 Wp 22.70 % TOPCon
The verdict

STP505S-H54-Nfb+ leads on the differences that matter

The largest is rated power: 205 W more power. 6 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 13 differences
How alike are they
6 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

13 of 19 parameters
Parameter STP710S-D66-Nsh+ STP505S-H54-Nfb+ Difference
Rated power 710 Wp 505 Wp 205 W more power
Weight 38.5 kg 23.5 kg 15.0 kg lighter
Product warranty 12 yrs 25 yrs 13 yrs longer
Weight per kWp 54.2 kg/kWp 46.5 kg/kWp 7.7 kg/kWp lighter
Open-circuit voltage 48.77 V 40.55 V 8.22 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.48 A 15.68 A 2.80 A apart
Module area 3.106 m² 2.224 m² 0.883 m² apart
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.280 %/°C 0.010 %/°C better in heat
Voltage at max power 40.48 V 34.17 V 6.31 V apart
Current at max power 17.54 A 14.78 A 2.76 A apart
Cell count 132 108 24 cells apart
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 1961x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 1961x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
STP710S-D66-Nsh+
23,822 kWh
STP505S-H54-Nfb+
16,944 kWh
Lifetime gap
6,878 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario STP710S-D66-Nsh+ STP505S-H54-Nfb+
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 710 W 505 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 679 W 484 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 648 W 463 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 617 W 441 W
03

Full specification

Parameter STP710S-D66-Nsh+ STP505S-H54-Nfb+ Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 710 Wp 505 Wp +205 W for STP710S-D66-Nsh+
Module efficiency 22.86 % 22.70 % Effectively the same
Power density 228.6 Wp/m² 227.1 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 48.77 V 40.55 V 8.22 V apart
Voltage at max power 40.48 V 34.17 V 6.31 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.48 A 15.68 A 2.80 A apart
Current at max power 17.54 A 14.78 A 2.76 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.280 %/°C +0.010 %/°C for STP505S-H54-Nfb+
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 1961x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 1961x1134x30 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 2.224 m² 0.883 m² apart
Weight 38.5 kg 23.5 kg -15.0 kg for STP505S-H54-Nfb+
Weight per kWp 54.2 kg/kWp 46.5 kg/kWp -7.7 kg/kWp for STP505S-H54-Nfb+
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 25 yrs +13 yrs for STP505S-H54-Nfb+
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 108 24 cells apart
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#2,536 vs #3,307
STP710S-D66-Nsh+ leads by 771 places
Power density
#2,474 vs #3,312
STP710S-D66-Nsh+ leads by 838 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #1,309
STP505S-H54-Nfb+ leads by 856 places
Weight
#8,457 vs #1,199
STP505S-H54-Nfb+ leads by 7,258 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#869 vs #4,015
STP710S-D66-Nsh+ leads by 3,146 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Suntech STP710S-D66-Nsh+ vs Suntech STP735S-D66-Nsh+
8 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Suntech STP710S-D66-Nsh+ vs Suntech STP730S-D66-Nsh+
7 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Suntech STP710S-D66-Nsh+ vs Suntech STP725S-D66-Nsh+
7 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Suntech STP710S-D66-Nsh+ vs Suntech STP720S-D66-Nsh+
7 differences, the largest is product warranty
Same series, other bin
Suntech STP710S-D66-Nsh+ vs Suntech STP715S-D66-Nsh+
3 differences, the largest is product warranty
Same series, other bin
Suntech STP710S-D66-Nsh+ vs Suntech STP705S-D66-Nsh+
The same specification on paper
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Suntech STP710S-D66-Nsh+ or Suntech STP505S-H54-Nfb+?
According to our database: Suntech STP710S-D66-Nsh+ has higher module efficiency (22.86% vs 22.70%); Suntech STP505S-H54-Nfb+ tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.280%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Suntech STP710S-D66-Nsh+ and Suntech STP505S-H54-Nfb+?
Suntech STP710S-D66-Nsh+ has a module efficiency of 22.86%, while Suntech STP505S-H54-Nfb+ is 22.70%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Suntech STP710S-D66-Nsh+ use vs Suntech STP505S-H54-Nfb+?
Suntech STP710S-D66-Nsh+ uses TOPCon cells; Suntech STP505S-H54-Nfb+ uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Suntech STP710S-D66-Nsh+ and Suntech STP505S-H54-Nfb+?
Suntech STP710S-D66-Nsh+ has a 30 years power warranty; Suntech STP505S-H54-Nfb+ has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Suntech STP710S-D66-Nsh+ and Suntech STP505S-H54-Nfb+ bifacial panels?
Suntech STP710S-D66-Nsh+ is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Suntech STP505S-H54-Nfb+ is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 30 Suntech offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.