Skip to main content
STP635S-H66-Nsh+ vs STP705S-D66-Nsh+ 7 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Suntech STP635S-H66-Nsh+ vs Suntech STP705S-D66-Nsh+

Suntech STP635S-H66-Nsh+
STP635S-H66-Nsh+
635 Wp 23.50 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
Suntech STP705S-D66-Nsh+
STP705S-D66-Nsh+
705 Wp 22.70 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

STP635S-H66-Nsh+ leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.80 pp more efficient. 7 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 12 differences
How alike are they
7 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

12 of 19 parameters
Parameter STP635S-H66-Nsh+ STP705S-D66-Nsh+ Difference
Module efficiency 23.50 % 22.70 % 0.80 pp more efficient
Rated power 635 Wp 705 Wp 70 W more power
Weight 33.1 kg 38.5 kg 5.4 kg lighter
Power density 235.1 Wp/m² 227.0 Wp/m² 8.1 Wp/m² higher
Product warranty 15 yrs 12 yrs 3 yrs longer
Short-circuit current 16.08 A 18.43 A 2.35 A apart
Module area 2.701 m² 3.106 m² 0.405 m² apart
Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.290 %/°C 0.010 %/°C better in heat
Current at max power 15.31 A 17.49 A 2.18 A apart
Weight per kWp 52.1 kg/kWp 54.6 kg/kWp 2.5 kg/kWp lighter
Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2382x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Voltage at max power 41.50 V 40.31 V 1.19 V apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
STP635S-H66-Nsh+
21,306 kWh
STP705S-D66-Nsh+
23,654 kWh
Lifetime gap
2,348 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario STP635S-H66-Nsh+ STP705S-D66-Nsh+
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 635 W 705 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 608 W 674 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 582 W 644 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 555 W 613 W
03

Full specification

Parameter STP635S-H66-Nsh+ STP705S-D66-Nsh+ Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 635 Wp 705 Wp +70 W for STP705S-D66-Nsh+
Module efficiency 23.50 % 22.70 % +0.80 pp for STP635S-H66-Nsh+
Power density 235.1 Wp/m² 227.0 Wp/m² +8.1 Wp/m² for STP635S-H66-Nsh+
Open-circuit voltage 49.50 V 48.57 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 41.50 V 40.31 V 1.19 V apart
Short-circuit current 16.08 A 18.43 A 2.35 A apart
Current at max power 15.31 A 17.49 A 2.18 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.290 %/°C +0.010 %/°C for STP635S-H66-Nsh+
Mechanical
Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2382x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area 2.701 m² 3.106 m² 0.405 m² apart
Weight 33.1 kg 38.5 kg -5.4 kg for STP635S-H66-Nsh+
Weight per kWp 52.1 kg/kWp 54.6 kg/kWp -2.5 kg/kWp for STP635S-H66-Nsh+
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 12 yrs +3 yrs for STP635S-H66-Nsh+
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#716 vs #3,307
STP635S-H66-Nsh+ leads by 2,591 places
Power density
#741 vs #3,361
STP635S-H66-Nsh+ leads by 2,620 places
Heat behaviour
#1,309 vs #2,165
STP635S-H66-Nsh+ leads by 856 places
Weight
#5,600 vs #8,959
STP635S-H66-Nsh+ leads by 3,359 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#1,462 vs #1,037
STP705S-D66-Nsh+ leads by 425 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Suntech STP635S-H66-Nsh+ vs Suntech STP735S-D66-Nsh+
7 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Suntech STP635S-H66-Nsh+ vs Suntech STP730S-D66-Nsh+
6 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Suntech STP635S-H66-Nsh+ vs Suntech STP725S-D66-Nsh+
7 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Suntech STP635S-H66-Nsh+ vs Suntech STP720S-D66-Nsh+
8 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Suntech STP635S-H66-Nsh+ vs Suntech STP715S-D66-Nsh+
8 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Suntech STP635S-H66-Nsh+ vs Suntech STP710S-D66-Nsh+
12 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Suntech STP635S-H66-Nsh+ or Suntech STP705S-D66-Nsh+?
According to our database: Suntech STP635S-H66-Nsh+ has higher module efficiency (23.50% vs 22.70%); Suntech STP635S-H66-Nsh+ tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.280%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Suntech STP635S-H66-Nsh+ and Suntech STP705S-D66-Nsh+?
Suntech STP635S-H66-Nsh+ has a module efficiency of 23.50%, while Suntech STP705S-D66-Nsh+ is 22.70%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Suntech STP635S-H66-Nsh+ use vs Suntech STP705S-D66-Nsh+?
Suntech STP635S-H66-Nsh+ uses TOPCon cells; Suntech STP705S-D66-Nsh+ uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Suntech STP635S-H66-Nsh+ and Suntech STP705S-D66-Nsh+?
Suntech STP635S-H66-Nsh+ has a 30 years power warranty; Suntech STP705S-D66-Nsh+ has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Suntech STP635S-H66-Nsh+ and Suntech STP705S-D66-Nsh+ bifacial panels?
Both Suntech STP635S-H66-Nsh+ and Suntech STP705S-D66-Nsh+ are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 29 Suntech offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.