Skip to main content
BGT66(710)-G12 vs BWT66(715)-G12 13 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Sunova TS-BGT66(710)-G12 vs Sunova TS-BWT66(715)-G12

TS-BGT66(710)-G12
710 Wp 22.90 % N-type Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
TS-BWT66(715)-G12
715 Wp 23.00 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

BWT66(715)-G12 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is weight: 3.9 kg lighter. 13 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 6 differences
How alike are they
13 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

6 of 19 parameters
Parameter BGT66(710)-G12 BWT66(715)-G12 Difference
Weight 37.8 kg 33.9 kg 3.9 kg lighter
Weight per kWp 53.2 kg/kWp 47.4 kg/kWp 5.8 kg/kWp lighter
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.290 %/°C 0.010 %/°C better in heat
Cell technology N-type TOPCon N-type vs TOPCon
Open-circuit voltage 49.00 V 46.68 V 2.32 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.40 A 18.92 A 0.52 A apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
BGT66(710)-G12
23,822 kWh
BWT66(715)-G12
23,990 kWh
Lifetime gap
168 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario BGT66(710)-G12 BWT66(715)-G12
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 710 W 715 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 678 W 684 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 646 W 653 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 614 W 622 W
03

Full specification

Parameter BGT66(710)-G12 BWT66(715)-G12 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 710 Wp 715 Wp Effectively the same
Module efficiency 22.90 % 23.00 % Effectively the same
Power density 228.6 Wp/m² 230.2 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 49.00 V 46.68 V 2.32 V apart
Voltage at max power 40.90 V 40.35 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 18.40 A 18.92 A 0.52 A apart
Current at max power 17.36 A 17.72 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.290 %/°C +0.010 %/°C for BWT66(715)-G12
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x35 mm Same
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 37.8 kg 33.9 kg -3.9 kg for BWT66(715)-G12
Weight per kWp 53.2 kg/kWp 47.4 kg/kWp -5.8 kg/kWp for BWT66(715)-G12
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology N-type TOPCon N-type vs TOPCon
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#2,359 vs #1,919
BWT66(715)-G12 leads by 440 places
Power density
#2,474 vs #2,018
BWT66(715)-G12 leads by 456 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093 vs #2,165
BWT66(715)-G12 leads by 3,928 places
Weight
#7,077 vs #1,670
BWT66(715)-G12 leads by 5,407 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#576 vs #434
BWT66(715)-G12 leads by 142 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Sunova TS-BGT66(710)-G12 vs Sunova TS-BGT66(720)-G12
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Sunova TS-BGT66(710)-G12 vs Sunova TS-BGT66(715)-G12
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Sunova TS-BGT66(710)-G12 vs Sunova TS-BGT66(705)-G12
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Sunova TS-BGT66(710)-G12 vs Sunova TS-BGT66(700)-G12
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Sunova TS-BGT66(710)-G12 vs Sunova TS-BGT66(620)-G11
7 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Sunova TS-BGT66(710)-G12 vs Sunova TS-BGT66(615)-G11
7 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Sunova TS-BGT66(710)-G12 or Sunova TS-BWT66(715)-G12?
According to our database: Sunova TS-BWT66(715)-G12 has higher module efficiency (23.00% vs 22.90%); Sunova TS-BWT66(715)-G12 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.290%/°C vs -0.300%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Sunova TS-BGT66(710)-G12 and Sunova TS-BWT66(715)-G12?
Sunova TS-BGT66(710)-G12 has a module efficiency of 22.90%, while Sunova TS-BWT66(715)-G12 is 23.00%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Sunova TS-BGT66(710)-G12 use vs Sunova TS-BWT66(715)-G12?
Sunova TS-BGT66(710)-G12 uses N-type cells; Sunova TS-BWT66(715)-G12 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Sunova TS-BGT66(710)-G12 and Sunova TS-BWT66(715)-G12?
Sunova TS-BGT66(710)-G12 has a 30 years power warranty; Sunova TS-BWT66(715)-G12 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Sunova TS-BGT66(710)-G12 and Sunova TS-BWT66(715)-G12 bifacial panels?
Both Sunova TS-BGT66(710)-G12 and Sunova TS-BWT66(715)-G12 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.