Skip to main content
DXM8-72HBG 560W vs DXM10-48H 470W 6 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 560W vs Sun Earth DXM10-48H 470W

Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 560W
Sun Earth
DXM8-72HBG 560W
560 Wp 21.70 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
Sun Earth
DXM10-48H 470W
470 Wp 23.50 % TOPCon
The verdict

DXM10-48H 470W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.80 pp more efficient. 6 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 13 differences
How alike are they
6 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

13 of 19 parameters
Parameter DXM8-72HBG 560W DXM10-48H 470W Difference
Module efficiency 21.70 % 23.50 % 1.80 pp more efficient
Rated power 560 Wp 470 Wp 90 W more power
Power density 216.8 Wp/m² 235.2 Wp/m² 18.4 Wp/m² higher
Weight 32.0 kg 21.0 kg 11.0 kg lighter
Weight per kWp 57.1 kg/kWp 44.7 kg/kWp 12.5 kg/kWp lighter
Open-circuit voltage 50.10 V 36.72 V 13.38 V apart
Module area 2.583 m² 1.998 m² 0.585 m² apart
Short-circuit current 14.13 A 15.88 A 1.75 A apart
Voltage at max power 42.10 V 31.25 V 10.85 V apart
Cell count 144 96 48 cells apart
Current at max power 13.30 A 15.04 A 1.74 A apart
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
Dimensions 2278x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm 2278x1134x30 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
DXM8-72HBG 560W
18,789 kWh
DXM10-48H 470W
15,769 kWh
Lifetime gap
3,020 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario DXM8-72HBG 560W DXM10-48H 470W
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 560 W 470 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 536 W 450 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 511 W 429 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 487 W 409 W
03

Full specification

Parameter DXM8-72HBG 560W DXM10-48H 470W Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 560 Wp 470 Wp +90 W for DXM8-72HBG 560W
Module efficiency 21.70 % 23.50 % +1.80 pp for DXM10-48H 470W
Power density 216.8 Wp/m² 235.2 Wp/m² +18.4 Wp/m² for DXM10-48H 470W
Open-circuit voltage 50.10 V 36.72 V 13.38 V apart
Voltage at max power 42.10 V 31.25 V 10.85 V apart
Short-circuit current 14.13 A 15.88 A 1.75 A apart
Current at max power 13.30 A 15.04 A 1.74 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2278x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm 2278x1134x30 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm
Module area 2.583 m² 1.998 m² 0.585 m² apart
Weight 32.0 kg 21.0 kg -11.0 kg for DXM10-48H 470W
Weight per kWp 57.1 kg/kWp 44.7 kg/kWp -12.5 kg/kWp for DXM10-48H 470W
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 96 48 cells apart
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#7,421 vs #716
DXM10-48H 470W leads by 6,705 places
Power density
#7,452 vs #674
DXM10-48H 470W leads by 6,778 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#11,052 vs #504
DXM10-48H 470W leads by 10,548 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#6,069 vs #6,925
DXM8-72HBG 560W leads by 856 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Sun Earth
Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 560W vs Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 610W
8 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Sun Earth
Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 560W vs Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 600W
7 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Sun Earth
Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 560W vs Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 590W
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Sun Earth
Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 560W vs Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 580W
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Sun Earth
Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 560W vs Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 570W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Sun Earth
Sun Earth DXM10-48H 470W vs Sun Earth DXM8-60HBG 505W
12 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 560W or Sun Earth DXM10-48H 470W?
According to our database: Sun Earth DXM10-48H 470 W has higher module efficiency (23.50% vs 21.70%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 560W and Sun Earth DXM10-48H 470W?
Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 560 W has a module efficiency of 21.70%, while Sun Earth DXM10-48H 470 W is 23.50%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 560W use vs Sun Earth DXM10-48H 470W?
Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 560 W uses TOPCon cells; Sun Earth DXM10-48H 470 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 560W and Sun Earth DXM10-48H 470W?
Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 560 W has a 30 years power warranty; Sun Earth DXM10-48H 470 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 560W and Sun Earth DXM10-48H 470W bifacial panels?
Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 560 W is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Sun Earth DXM10-48H 470 W is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 12 Sun Earth offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.