Skip to main content
54HBG-435 vs 72H-610 6 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-435 vs Sun Earth DXM8-72H-610

Sun Earth
DXM8-54HBG-435
435 Wp 22.30 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Sun Earth
DXM8-72H-610
610 Wp 23.60 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

72H-610 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.30 pp more efficient. 6 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 13 differences
How alike are they
6 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

13 of 19 parameters
Parameter 54HBG-435 72H-610 Difference
Module efficiency 22.30 % 23.60 % 1.30 pp more efficient
Rated power 435 Wp 610 Wp 175 W more power
Power density 222.8 Wp/m² 236.1 Wp/m² 13.4 Wp/m² higher
Performance warranty 40 yrs 30 yrs 10 yrs longer
Weight per kWp 56.3 kg/kWp 44.3 kg/kWp 12.1 kg/kWp lighter
Product warranty 40 yrs 12 yrs 28 yrs longer
Open-circuit voltage 38.50 V 52.50 V 14.00 V apart
Module area 1.953 m² 2.583 m² 0.631 m² apart
Weight 24.5 kg 27.0 kg 2.5 kg lighter
Voltage at max power 31.90 V 43.10 V 11.20 V apart
Cell count 108 144 36 cells apart
Dimensions 1722x1134x30 mm 2278x1134x30 mm 1722x1134x30 mm vs 2278x1134x30 mm
Current at max power 13.64 A 14.15 A 0.51 A apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
54HBG-435
14,595 kWh
72H-610
20,467 kWh
Lifetime gap
5,872 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 54HBG-435 72H-610
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 435 W 610 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 416 W 583 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 397 W 557 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 378 W 530 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 54HBG-435 72H-610 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 435 Wp 610 Wp +175 W for 72H-610
Module efficiency 22.30 % 23.60 % +1.30 pp for 72H-610
Power density 222.8 Wp/m² 236.1 Wp/m² +13.4 Wp/m² for 72H-610
Open-circuit voltage 38.50 V 52.50 V 14.00 V apart
Voltage at max power 31.90 V 43.10 V 11.20 V apart
Short-circuit current 14.38 A 14.76 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.64 A 14.15 A 0.51 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1722x1134x30 mm 2278x1134x30 mm 1722x1134x30 mm vs 2278x1134x30 mm
Module area 1.953 m² 2.583 m² 0.631 m² apart
Weight 24.5 kg 27.0 kg -2.5 kg for 54HBG-435
Weight per kWp 56.3 kg/kWp 44.3 kg/kWp -12.1 kg/kWp for 72H-610
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 40 yrs 12 yrs +28 yrs for 54HBG-435
Performance warranty 40 yrs 30 yrs +10 yrs for 54HBG-435
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 144 36 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#5,161 vs #659
72H-610 leads by 4,502 places
Power density
#5,212 vs #656
72H-610 leads by 4,556 places
Heat behaviour
#2,220 vs #2,220
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#10,653 vs #412
72H-610 leads by 10,241 places
Warranty
#1 vs #21
54HBG-435 leads by 20 places
Overall
#2,056 vs #2,166
54HBG-435 leads by 110 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Sun Earth
Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-435 vs Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-455
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Sun Earth
Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-435 vs Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-450
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Sun Earth
Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-435 vs Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-440
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Sun Earth
Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-435 vs Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-430
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Sun Earth
Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-435 vs Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-420
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Sun Earth
Sun Earth DXM8-72H-610 vs Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 610W
2 differences, the largest is weight
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-435 or Sun Earth DXM8-72H-610?
According to our database: Sun Earth DXM8-72H-610 has higher module efficiency (23.60% vs 22.30%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-435 and Sun Earth DXM8-72H-610?
Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-435 has a module efficiency of 22.30%, while Sun Earth DXM8-72H-610 is 23.60%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-435 use vs Sun Earth DXM8-72H-610?
Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-435 uses TOPCon cells; Sun Earth DXM8-72H-610 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-435 and Sun Earth DXM8-72H-610?
Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-435 has a 40 years power warranty; Sun Earth DXM8-72H-610 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-435 and Sun Earth DXM8-72H-610 bifacial panels?
Both Sun Earth DXM8-54HBG-435 and Sun Earth DXM8-72H-610 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 17 Sun Earth offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.