Skip to main content
DXM10-48H 470W vs DXM8-72HBG 580W 6 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Sun Earth DXM10-48H 470W vs Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 580W

Sun Earth
DXM10-48H 470W
470 Wp 23.50 % TOPCon
VS
Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 580W
Sun Earth
DXM8-72HBG 580W
580 Wp 22.50 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

DXM10-48H 470W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.00 pp more efficient. 6 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 13 differences
How alike are they
6 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

13 of 19 parameters
Parameter DXM10-48H 470W DXM8-72HBG 580W Difference
Module efficiency 23.50 % 22.50 % 1.00 pp more efficient
Rated power 470 Wp 580 Wp 110 W more power
Power density 235.2 Wp/m² 224.5 Wp/m² 10.7 Wp/m² higher
Weight 21.0 kg 32.0 kg 11.0 kg lighter
Weight per kWp 44.7 kg/kWp 55.2 kg/kWp 10.5 kg/kWp lighter
Open-circuit voltage 36.72 V 51.30 V 14.58 V apart
Module area 1.998 m² 2.583 m² 0.585 m² apart
Short-circuit current 15.88 A 14.39 A 1.49 A apart
Voltage at max power 31.25 V 42.50 V 11.25 V apart
Cell count 96 144 48 cells apart
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
Current at max power 15.04 A 13.65 A 1.39 A apart
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 2278x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm vs 2278x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
DXM10-48H 470W
15,769 kWh
DXM8-72HBG 580W
19,460 kWh
Lifetime gap
3,691 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario DXM10-48H 470W DXM8-72HBG 580W
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 470 W 580 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 450 W 555 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 429 W 530 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 409 W 504 W
03

Full specification

Parameter DXM10-48H 470W DXM8-72HBG 580W Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 470 Wp 580 Wp +110 W for DXM8-72HBG 580W
Module efficiency 23.50 % 22.50 % +1.00 pp for DXM10-48H 470W
Power density 235.2 Wp/m² 224.5 Wp/m² +10.7 Wp/m² for DXM10-48H 470W
Open-circuit voltage 36.72 V 51.30 V 14.58 V apart
Voltage at max power 31.25 V 42.50 V 11.25 V apart
Short-circuit current 15.88 A 14.39 A 1.49 A apart
Current at max power 15.04 A 13.65 A 1.39 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 2278x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm vs 2278x1134x30 mm
Module area 1.998 m² 2.583 m² 0.585 m² apart
Weight 21.0 kg 32.0 kg -11.0 kg for DXM10-48H 470W
Weight per kWp 44.7 kg/kWp 55.2 kg/kWp -10.5 kg/kWp for DXM10-48H 470W
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 96 144 48 cells apart
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#716 vs #4,222
DXM10-48H 470W leads by 3,506 places
Power density
#674 vs #4,547
DXM10-48H 470W leads by 3,873 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#504 vs #9,588
DXM10-48H 470W leads by 9,084 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#6,925 vs #4,495
DXM8-72HBG 580W leads by 2,430 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Sun Earth
Sun Earth DXM10-48H 470W vs Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 610W
11 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Sun Earth
Sun Earth DXM10-48H 470W vs Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 600W
12 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Sun Earth
Sun Earth DXM10-48H 470W vs Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 590W
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Sun Earth
Sun Earth DXM10-48H 470W vs Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 570W
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Sun Earth
Sun Earth DXM10-48H 470W vs Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 560W
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Sun Earth
Sun Earth DXM10-48H 470W vs Sun Earth DXM8-60HBG 505W
12 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Sun Earth DXM10-48H 470W or Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 580W?
According to our database: Sun Earth DXM10-48H 470 W has higher module efficiency (23.50% vs 22.50%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Sun Earth DXM10-48H 470W and Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 580W?
Sun Earth DXM10-48H 470 W has a module efficiency of 23.50%, while Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 580 W is 22.50%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Sun Earth DXM10-48H 470W use vs Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 580W?
Sun Earth DXM10-48H 470 W uses TOPCon cells; Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 580 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Sun Earth DXM10-48H 470W and Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 580W?
Sun Earth DXM10-48H 470 W has a 30 years power warranty; Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 580 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Sun Earth DXM10-48H 470W and Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 580W bifacial panels?
Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 580 W is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Sun Earth DXM10-48H 470 W is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 12 Sun Earth offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.