Skip to main content
SPV680-TG12-132BD vs SPV660-TG12-132BD 16 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

SpolarPV SPV680-TG12-132BD vs SpolarPV SPV660-TG12-132BD

SpolarPV
SPV680-TG12-132BD
680 Wp 21.92 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
SpolarPV
SPV660-TG12-132BD
660 Wp 21.28 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

SPV680-TG12-132BD leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.64 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
16 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

3 of 19 parameters
Parameter SPV680-TG12-132BD SPV660-TG12-132BD Difference
Module efficiency 21.92 % 21.28 % 0.64 pp more efficient
Power density 219.2 Wp/m² 212.7 Wp/m² 6.4 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 680 Wp 660 Wp 20 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
SPV680-TG12-132BD
22,375 kWh
SPV660-TG12-132BD
21,717 kWh
Lifetime gap
658 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario SPV680-TG12-132BD SPV660-TG12-132BD
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 680 W 660 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 649 W 630 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 619 W 601 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 588 W 571 W
03

Full specification

Parameter SPV680-TG12-132BD SPV660-TG12-132BD Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 680 Wp 660 Wp +20 W for SPV680-TG12-132BD
Module efficiency 21.92 % 21.28 % +0.64 pp for SPV680-TG12-132BD
Power density 219.2 Wp/m² 212.7 Wp/m² +6.4 Wp/m² for SPV680-TG12-132BD
Open-circuit voltage 46.90 V 46.10 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 39.63 V 38.81 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 17.96 A 17.84 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 17.18 A 17.01 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.300 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2383x1302x30 mm 2383x1302x30 mm Same
Module area 3.103 m² 3.103 m² Same
Weight 38.0 kg 38.0 kg Same
Weight per kWp 55.9 kg/kWp 57.6 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.46 %/yr 0.46 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#6,767 vs #8,795
SPV680-TG12-132BD leads by 2,028 places
Power density
#6,738 vs #8,718
SPV680-TG12-132BD leads by 1,980 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093 vs #6,093
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#10,244 vs #11,284
SPV680-TG12-132BD leads by 1,040 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#1,903 vs #3,149
SPV680-TG12-132BD leads by 1,246 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
SpolarPV
SpolarPV SPV680-TG12-132BD vs SpolarPV SPV690-TG12-132BD
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
SpolarPV
SpolarPV SPV680-TG12-132BD vs SpolarPV SPV685-TG12-132BD
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
SpolarPV
SpolarPV SPV680-TG12-132BD vs SpolarPV SPV675-TG12-132BD
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
SpolarPV
SpolarPV SPV680-TG12-132BD vs SpolarPV SPV670-TG12-132BD
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
SpolarPV
SpolarPV SPV680-TG12-132BD vs SpolarPV SPV665-TG12-132BD
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
SpolarPV
SpolarPV SPV680-TG12-132BD vs SpolarPV SPV700-TG12-132BD
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: SpolarPV SPV680-TG12-132BD or SpolarPV SPV660-TG12-132BD?
According to our database: SpolarPV SPV680-TG12-132BD has higher module efficiency (21.92% vs 21.28%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of SpolarPV SPV680-TG12-132BD and SpolarPV SPV660-TG12-132BD?
SpolarPV SPV680-TG12-132BD has a module efficiency of 21.92%, while SpolarPV SPV660-TG12-132BD is 21.28%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does SpolarPV SPV680-TG12-132BD use vs SpolarPV SPV660-TG12-132BD?
SpolarPV SPV680-TG12-132BD uses TOPCon cells; SpolarPV SPV660-TG12-132BD uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on SpolarPV SPV680-TG12-132BD and SpolarPV SPV660-TG12-132BD?
SpolarPV SPV680-TG12-132BD has a 30 years power warranty; SpolarPV SPV660-TG12-132BD has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are SpolarPV SPV680-TG12-132BD and SpolarPV SPV660-TG12-132BD bifacial panels?
Both SpolarPV SPV680-TG12-132BD and SpolarPV SPV660-TG12-132BD are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.