Skip to main content
SPV675-TG12-132BD vs SPV665-TG12-132BD 16 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

SpolarPV SPV675-TG12-132BD vs SpolarPV SPV665-TG12-132BD

SpolarPV
SPV675-TG12-132BD
675 Wp 21.76 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
SpolarPV
SPV665-TG12-132BD
665 Wp 21.44 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

SPV675-TG12-132BD leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.32 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
16 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

3 of 19 parameters
Parameter SPV675-TG12-132BD SPV665-TG12-132BD Difference
Module efficiency 21.76 % 21.44 % 0.32 pp more efficient
Power density 217.6 Wp/m² 214.3 Wp/m² 3.2 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 675 Wp 665 Wp 10 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
SPV675-TG12-132BD
22,211 kWh
SPV665-TG12-132BD
21,882 kWh
Lifetime gap
329 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario SPV675-TG12-132BD SPV665-TG12-132BD
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 675 W 665 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 645 W 635 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 614 W 605 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 584 W 575 W
03

Full specification

Parameter SPV675-TG12-132BD SPV665-TG12-132BD Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 675 Wp 665 Wp +10 W for SPV675-TG12-132BD
Module efficiency 21.76 % 21.44 % +0.32 pp for SPV675-TG12-132BD
Power density 217.6 Wp/m² 214.3 Wp/m² +3.2 Wp/m² for SPV675-TG12-132BD
Open-circuit voltage 46.70 V 46.30 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 39.43 V 39.00 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 17.93 A 17.87 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 17.14 A 17.06 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.300 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2383x1302x30 mm 2383x1302x30 mm Same
Module area 3.103 m² 3.103 m² Same
Weight 38.0 kg 38.0 kg Same
Weight per kWp 56.3 kg/kWp 57.1 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.46 %/yr 0.46 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#7,285 vs #8,267
SPV675-TG12-132BD leads by 982 places
Power density
#7,310 vs #8,232
SPV675-TG12-132BD leads by 922 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093 vs #6,093
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#10,556 vs #11,052
SPV675-TG12-132BD leads by 496 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#2,161 vs #2,776
SPV675-TG12-132BD leads by 615 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
SpolarPV
SpolarPV SPV675-TG12-132BD vs SpolarPV SPV690-TG12-132BD
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
SpolarPV
SpolarPV SPV675-TG12-132BD vs SpolarPV SPV685-TG12-132BD
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
SpolarPV
SpolarPV SPV675-TG12-132BD vs SpolarPV SPV680-TG12-132BD
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
SpolarPV
SpolarPV SPV675-TG12-132BD vs SpolarPV SPV670-TG12-132BD
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
SpolarPV
SpolarPV SPV675-TG12-132BD vs SpolarPV SPV660-TG12-132BD
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
SpolarPV
SpolarPV SPV675-TG12-132BD vs SpolarPV SPV700-TG12-132BD
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: SpolarPV SPV675-TG12-132BD or SpolarPV SPV665-TG12-132BD?
According to our database: SpolarPV SPV675-TG12-132BD has higher module efficiency (21.76% vs 21.44%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of SpolarPV SPV675-TG12-132BD and SpolarPV SPV665-TG12-132BD?
SpolarPV SPV675-TG12-132BD has a module efficiency of 21.76%, while SpolarPV SPV665-TG12-132BD is 21.44%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does SpolarPV SPV675-TG12-132BD use vs SpolarPV SPV665-TG12-132BD?
SpolarPV SPV675-TG12-132BD uses TOPCon cells; SpolarPV SPV665-TG12-132BD uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on SpolarPV SPV675-TG12-132BD and SpolarPV SPV665-TG12-132BD?
SpolarPV SPV675-TG12-132BD has a 30 years power warranty; SpolarPV SPV665-TG12-132BD has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are SpolarPV SPV675-TG12-132BD and SpolarPV SPV665-TG12-132BD bifacial panels?
Both SpolarPV SPV675-TG12-132BD and SpolarPV SPV665-TG12-132BD are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.