Skip to main content
450Wp vs 460 Wp 15 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision M 5.0 450Wp vs Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision M 5.0 460 Wp

Solarwatt
SOLARWATT Panel vision M 5.0 450Wp
450 Wp 22.50 % TOPCon Bifacial Incomplete
VS
Solarwatt
SOLARWATT Panel vision M 5.0 460 Wp
460 Wp 23.00 % TOPCon Bifacial Incomplete
The verdict

460 Wp leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.50 pp more efficient. 15 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
15 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

3 of 18 parameters
Parameter 450Wp 460 Wp Difference
Module efficiency 22.50 % 23.00 % 0.50 pp more efficient
Power density 225.2 Wp/m² 230.2 Wp/m² 5.0 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 450 Wp 460 Wp 10 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
450Wp
15,098 kWh
460 Wp
15,434 kWh
Lifetime gap
336 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 450Wp 460 Wp
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 450 W 460 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 430 W 440 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 411 W 420 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 391 W 400 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 450Wp 460 Wp Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 450 Wp 460 Wp +10 W for 460 Wp
Module efficiency 22.50 % 23.00 % +0.50 pp for 460 Wp
Power density 225.2 Wp/m² 230.2 Wp/m² +5.0 Wp/m² for 460 Wp
Open-circuit voltage 39.80 V 40.20 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 33.20 V 33.60 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 14.00 A 14.20 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.50 A 13.70 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1762x1134x35 mm 1762x1134x35 mm Same
Module area 1.998 m² 1.998 m² Same
Weight 24.8 kg 24.8 kg Same
Weight per kWp 55.1 kg/kWp 53.9 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 108 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#4,222 vs #1,919
460 Wp leads by 2,303 places
Power density
#4,225 vs #1,876
460 Wp leads by 2,349 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#9,543 vs #8,045
460 Wp leads by 1,498 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#5,200 vs #4,310
460 Wp leads by 890 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Solarwatt
Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision M 5.0 450Wp vs Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision M 5.0 455 Wp
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Solarwatt
Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision M 5.0 450Wp vs Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision M 5.0 450 Wp
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Solarwatt
Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision M 5.0 450Wp vs Solarwatt vision M 5.0 450 Wp
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Solarwatt
Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision M 5.0 450Wp vs Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision M 5.0 445 Wp
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Solarwatt
Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision M 5.0 450Wp vs Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision M 5.0 445Wp
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Solarwatt
Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision M 5.0 450Wp vs Solarwatt vision M 5.0 445 Wp
One difference: module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision M 5.0 450Wp or Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision M 5.0 460 Wp?
According to our database: Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision M 5.0 460 Wp has higher module efficiency (23.00% vs 22.50%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision M 5.0 450Wp and Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision M 5.0 460 Wp?
Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision M 5.0 450 Wp has a module efficiency of 22.50%, while Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision M 5.0 460 Wp is 23.00%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision M 5.0 450Wp use vs Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision M 5.0 460 Wp?
Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision M 5.0 450 Wp uses TOPCon cells; Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision M 5.0 460 Wp uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision M 5.0 450Wp and Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision M 5.0 460 Wp?
Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision M 5.0 450 Wp has a 30 years power warranty; Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision M 5.0 460 Wp has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision M 5.0 450Wp and Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision M 5.0 460 Wp bifacial panels?
Both Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision M 5.0 450 Wp and Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision M 5.0 460 Wp are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.