Skip to main content
360 vs 360 Wp 18 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision GM 3.0 style 360 vs Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision GM 3.0 style 360 Wp

Solarwatt
SOLARWATT Panel vision GM 3.0 style 360
360 Wp 19.40 % PERC Bifacial Incomplete
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Solarwatt
SOLARWATT Panel vision GM 3.0 style 360 Wp
360 Wp 19.40 % PERC Bifacial Incomplete
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

Identical on every published parameter

All 18 comparable parameters agree, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it. Two records this alike are usually one panel sold under two names, or two bins of the same production line - decide on price and on who you would rather buy from.

How alike are they
18 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

0 of 18 parameters

Every comparable parameter agrees. The full specification is below.

02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.340 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
360
12,079 kWh
360 Wp
12,079 kWh
Lifetime gap
No difference
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 360 360 Wp
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 360 W 360 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.9% of rated power 342 W 342 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 89.8% of rated power 323 W 323 W
Hot roof 70 °C 84.7% of rated power 305 W 305 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 360 360 Wp Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 360 Wp 360 Wp Same
Module efficiency 19.40 % 19.40 % Same
Power density 192.3 Wp/m² 192.3 Wp/m² Same
Open-circuit voltage 41.30 V 41.30 V Same
Voltage at max power 34.50 V 34.50 V Same
Short-circuit current 11.10 A 11.10 A Same
Current at max power 10.50 A 10.50 A Same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.340 %/°C -0.340 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1780x1052x40 mm 1780x1052x40 mm Same
Module area 1.873 m² 1.873 m² Same
Weight 25.0 kg 25.0 kg Same
Weight per kWp 69.4 kg/kWp 69.4 kg/kWp Same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Technology
Cell technology PERC PERC Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 120 120 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#12,735 vs #12,735
Tied - the same position in the database
Power density
#12,828 vs #12,828
Tied - the same position in the database
Heat behaviour
#8,778 vs #8,778
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#13,378 vs #13,378
Tied - the same position in the database
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#11,156 vs #11,156
Tied - the same position in the database
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Solarwatt
Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision GM 3.0 style 360 vs Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision GM 3.0 style 370
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Solarwatt
Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision GM 3.0 style 360 vs Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision GM 3.0 style 370 Wp
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Solarwatt
Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision GM 3.0 style 360 vs Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision GM 3.0 style 365
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Solarwatt
Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision GM 3.0 style 360 vs Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision GM 3.0 style 365 Wp
One difference: module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Solarwatt
Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision GM 3.0 style 360 vs Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision M 5.0 460 Wp
12 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Solarwatt
Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision GM 3.0 style 360 vs Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision M 5.0 455 Wp
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision GM 3.0 style 360 or Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision GM 3.0 style 360 Wp?
According to our database: both panels are closely matched on key specs - the decision often comes down to price and local availability. See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision GM 3.0 style 360 and Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision GM 3.0 style 360 Wp?
Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision GM 3.0 style 360 has a module efficiency of 19.40%, while Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision GM 3.0 style 360 Wp is 19.40%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision GM 3.0 style 360 use vs Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision GM 3.0 style 360 Wp?
Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision GM 3.0 style 360 uses PERC cells; Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision GM 3.0 style 360 Wp uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision GM 3.0 style 360 and Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision GM 3.0 style 360 Wp?
Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision GM 3.0 style 360 has a 30 years power warranty; Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision GM 3.0 style 360 Wp has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision GM 3.0 style 360 and Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision GM 3.0 style 360 Wp bifacial panels?
Both Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision GM 3.0 style 360 and Solarwatt SOLARWATT Panel vision GM 3.0 style 360 Wp are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.