Solaria SPV680-TG12-132BD vs Solaria PowerXT 420R-PL
VS
The verdict
SPV680-TG12-132BD leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 2.02 pp more efficient. 2 of 16 comparable parameters are identical, with 3 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish them.
See all 14 differencesHow alike are they
2
of 16 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
14 of 16 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
SPV680-TG12-132BD
PowerXT 420R-PL
Difference
Module efficiency
21.92 %
19.90 %
2.02 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.390 %/°C
0.090 %/°C better in heat
Rated power
680 Wp
420 Wp
260 W more power
Power density
219.2 Wp/m²
198.9 Wp/m²
20.3 Wp/m² higher
Weight
38.0 kg
21.7 kg
16.3 kg lighter
Product warranty
12 yrs
30 yrs
18 yrs longer
Short-circuit current
17.96 A
11.60 A
6.36 A apart
Module area
3.103 m²
2.112 m²
0.991 m² apart
Weight per kWp
55.9 kg/kWp
51.7 kg/kWp
4.2 kg/kWp lighter
Current at max power
17.18 A
11.09 A
6.09 A apart
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
Open-circuit voltage
46.90 V
45.70 V
1.20 V apart
Dimensions
2383x1302x30 mm
1957x1079x35 mm
2383x1302x30 mm vs 1957x1079x35 mm
Voltage at max power
39.63 V
37.90 V
1.73 V apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Declared first-year losses, with 0.40% a year afterwards assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
SPV680-TG12-132BD
22,571 kWh
PowerXT 420R-PL
13,941 kWh
Lifetime gap
8,630 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
SPV680-TG12-132BD
PowerXT 420R-PL
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
680 W
420 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.2% of rated power
649 W
395 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
88.3% of rated power
619 W
371 W
Hot roof
70 °C
82.5% of rated power
588 W
346 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
SPV680-TG12-132BD
PowerXT 420R-PL
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
680 Wp
420 Wp
+260 W for SPV680-TG12-132BD
Module efficiency
21.92 %
19.90 %
+2.02 pp for SPV680-TG12-132BD
Power density
219.2 Wp/m²
198.9 Wp/m²
+20.3 Wp/m² for SPV680-TG12-132BD
Open-circuit voltage
46.90 V
45.70 V
1.20 V apart
Voltage at max power
39.63 V
37.90 V
1.73 V apart
Short-circuit current
17.96 A
11.60 A
6.36 A apart
Current at max power
17.18 A
11.09 A
6.09 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.390 %/°C
+0.090 %/°C for SPV680-TG12-132BD
Mechanical
Dimensions
2383x1302x30 mm
1957x1079x35 mm
2383x1302x30 mm vs 1957x1079x35 mm
Module area
3.103 m²
2.112 m²
0.991 m² apart
Weight
38.0 kg
21.7 kg
-16.3 kg for PowerXT 420R-PL
Weight per kWp
55.9 kg/kWp
51.7 kg/kWp
-4.2 kg/kWp for PowerXT 420R-PL
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
30 yrs
+18 yrs for PowerXT 420R-PL
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
-
0.48 %/yr
Not published by Solaria
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
-
Not published by Solaria
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
-
Not published by Solaria
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#6,767
vs
#12,331
SPV680-TG12-132BD leads by 5,564 places
Power density
#6,738
vs
#12,344
SPV680-TG12-132BD leads by 5,606 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093
vs
#13,579
SPV680-TG12-132BD leads by 7,486 places
Weight
#10,244
vs
#5,023
PowerXT 420R-PL leads by 5,221 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#1,903
vs
#9,324
SPV680-TG12-132BD leads by 7,421 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Solaria
Solaria SPV680-TG12-132BD vs Solaria SPV675-TG12-132BD
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Solaria
Solaria SPV680-TG12-132BD vs Solaria SPV670-TG12-132BD
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Solaria
Solaria SPV680-TG12-132BD vs Solaria SPV665-TG12-132BD
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Solaria
Solaria SPV680-TG12-132BD vs Solaria SPV660-TG12-132BD
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Solaria
Solaria PowerXT 420R-PL vs Solaria PowerXT 430R-PL
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Solaria
Solaria PowerXT 420R-PL vs Solaria Solaria PowerXT-430C-PD
9 differences, the largest is performance warranty
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Solaria SPV680-TG12-132BD or Solaria PowerXT 420R-PL?
According to our database: Solaria SPV680-TG12-132BD has higher module efficiency (21.92% vs 19.90%); Solaria SPV680-TG12-132BD tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.300%/°C vs -0.390%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Solaria SPV680-TG12-132BD and Solaria PowerXT 420R-PL?
Solaria SPV680-TG12-132BD has a module efficiency of 21.92%, while Solaria PowerXT 420R-PL is 19.90%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Solaria SPV680-TG12-132BD use vs Solaria PowerXT 420R-PL?
Solaria SPV680-TG12-132BD uses TOPCon cells; Solaria PowerXT 420R-PL uses Monocrystalline. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Solaria SPV680-TG12-132BD and Solaria PowerXT 420R-PL?
Solaria SPV680-TG12-132BD has a 30 years power warranty; Solaria PowerXT 420R-PL has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Solaria SPV680-TG12-132BD and Solaria PowerXT 420R-PL bifacial panels?
Solaria SPV680-TG12-132BD is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Solaria PowerXT 420R-PL is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 1 Solaria offer
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.