Solaria SPV670-TG12-132BD vs Solaria Solaria PowerX-395R
VS
The verdict
SPV670-TG12-132BD leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 1.39 pp more efficient. 2 of 16 comparable parameters are identical, with 3 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish them.
See all 14 differencesHow alike are they
2
of 16 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
14 of 16 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
SPV670-TG12-132BD
Solaria PowerX-395R
Difference
Module efficiency
21.59 %
20.20 %
1.39 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.360 %/°C
0.060 %/°C better in heat
Rated power
670 Wp
395 Wp
275 W more power
Power density
215.9 Wp/m²
202.2 Wp/m²
13.8 Wp/m² higher
Performance warranty
30 yrs
25 yrs
5 yrs longer
Weight
38.0 kg
22.1 kg
15.9 kg lighter
Product warranty
12 yrs
25 yrs
13 yrs longer
Open-circuit voltage
46.50 V
37.10 V
9.40 V apart
Short-circuit current
17.90 A
13.60 A
4.30 A apart
Module area
3.103 m²
1.954 m²
1.149 m² apart
Voltage at max power
39.21 V
30.80 V
8.41 V apart
Current at max power
17.09 A
12.82 A
4.27 A apart
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
Dimensions
2383x1302x30 mm
1723x1134x35 mm
2383x1302x30 mm vs 1723x1134x35 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Declared first-year losses, with 0.40% a year afterwards assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
SPV670-TG12-132BD
22,239 kWh
Solaria PowerX-395R
13,111 kWh
Lifetime gap
9,128 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
SPV670-TG12-132BD
Solaria PowerX-395R
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
670 W
395 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.6% of rated power
640 W
374 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
89.2% of rated power
610 W
352 W
Hot roof
70 °C
83.8% of rated power
580 W
331 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
SPV670-TG12-132BD
Solaria PowerX-395R
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
670 Wp
395 Wp
+275 W for SPV670-TG12-132BD
Module efficiency
21.59 %
20.20 %
+1.39 pp for SPV670-TG12-132BD
Power density
215.9 Wp/m²
202.2 Wp/m²
+13.8 Wp/m² for SPV670-TG12-132BD
Open-circuit voltage
46.50 V
37.10 V
9.40 V apart
Voltage at max power
39.21 V
30.80 V
8.41 V apart
Short-circuit current
17.90 A
13.60 A
4.30 A apart
Current at max power
17.09 A
12.82 A
4.27 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.360 %/°C
+0.060 %/°C for SPV670-TG12-132BD
Mechanical
Dimensions
2383x1302x30 mm
1723x1134x35 mm
2383x1302x30 mm vs 1723x1134x35 mm
Module area
3.103 m²
1.954 m²
1.149 m² apart
Weight
38.0 kg
22.1 kg
-15.9 kg for Solaria PowerX-395R
Weight per kWp
56.7 kg/kWp
55.9 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
25 yrs
+13 yrs for Solaria PowerX-395R
Performance warranty
30 yrs
25 yrs
+5 yrs for SPV670-TG12-132BD
Annual degradation
-
0.50 %/yr
Not published by Solaria
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
-
Not published by Solaria
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
-
Not published by Solaria
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#7,726
vs
#11,956
SPV670-TG12-132BD leads by 4,230 places
Power density
#7,627
vs
#11,961
SPV670-TG12-132BD leads by 4,334 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093
vs
#12,345
SPV670-TG12-132BD leads by 6,252 places
Weight
#10,811
vs
#10,283
Solaria PowerX-395R leads by 528 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#9,798
SPV670-TG12-132BD leads by 9,777 places
Overall
#2,462
vs
#10,998
SPV670-TG12-132BD leads by 8,536 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Solaria
Solaria SPV670-TG12-132BD vs Solaria SPV680-TG12-132BD
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Solaria
Solaria SPV670-TG12-132BD vs Solaria SPV675-TG12-132BD
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Solaria
Solaria SPV670-TG12-132BD vs Solaria SPV665-TG12-132BD
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Solaria
Solaria SPV670-TG12-132BD vs Solaria SPV660-TG12-132BD
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Solaria
Solaria Solaria PowerX-395R vs Solaria Solaria PowerX-400R
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Solaria
Solaria Solaria PowerX-395R vs Solaria Solaria PowerX-390R
One difference: module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Solaria SPV670-TG12-132BD or Solaria Solaria PowerX-395R?
According to our database: Solaria SPV670-TG12-132BD has higher module efficiency (21.59% vs 20.20%); Solaria SPV670-TG12-132BD tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.300%/°C vs -0.360%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Solaria SPV670-TG12-132BD and Solaria Solaria PowerX-395R?
Solaria SPV670-TG12-132BD has a module efficiency of 21.59%, while Solaria Solaria PowerX-395R is 20.20%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Solaria SPV670-TG12-132BD use vs Solaria Solaria PowerX-395R?
Solaria SPV670-TG12-132BD uses TOPCon cells; Solaria Solaria PowerX-395R uses Monocrystalline. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Solaria SPV670-TG12-132BD and Solaria Solaria PowerX-395R?
Solaria SPV670-TG12-132BD has a 30 years power warranty; Solaria Solaria PowerX-395R has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Solaria SPV670-TG12-132BD and Solaria Solaria PowerX-395R bifacial panels?
Solaria SPV670-TG12-132BD is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Solaria Solaria PowerX-395R is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 1 Solaria offer
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.