Solaria PowerXT 420R-PL vs Solaria SPV660-TG12-132BD
VS
The verdict
SPV660-TG12-132BD leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 1.38 pp more efficient. 4 of 16 comparable parameters are identical, with 3 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish them.
See all 12 differencesHow alike are they
4
of 16 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
12 of 16 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
PowerXT 420R-PL
SPV660-TG12-132BD
Difference
Module efficiency
19.90 %
21.28 %
1.38 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient
-0.390 %/°C
-0.300 %/°C
0.090 %/°C better in heat
Rated power
420 Wp
660 Wp
240 W more power
Power density
198.9 Wp/m²
212.7 Wp/m²
13.8 Wp/m² higher
Weight
21.7 kg
38.0 kg
16.3 kg lighter
Product warranty
30 yrs
12 yrs
18 yrs longer
Weight per kWp
51.7 kg/kWp
57.6 kg/kWp
5.9 kg/kWp lighter
Short-circuit current
11.60 A
17.84 A
6.24 A apart
Module area
2.112 m²
3.103 m²
0.991 m² apart
Current at max power
11.09 A
17.01 A
5.92 A apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
Dimensions
1957x1079x35 mm
2383x1302x30 mm
1957x1079x35 mm vs 2383x1302x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Declared first-year losses, with 0.40% a year afterwards assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
PowerXT 420R-PL
13,941 kWh
SPV660-TG12-132BD
21,907 kWh
Lifetime gap
7,966 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
PowerXT 420R-PL
SPV660-TG12-132BD
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
420 W
660 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.2% of rated power
395 W
630 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
88.3% of rated power
371 W
601 W
Hot roof
70 °C
82.5% of rated power
346 W
571 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
PowerXT 420R-PL
SPV660-TG12-132BD
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
420 Wp
660 Wp
+240 W for SPV660-TG12-132BD
Module efficiency
19.90 %
21.28 %
+1.38 pp for SPV660-TG12-132BD
Power density
198.9 Wp/m²
212.7 Wp/m²
+13.8 Wp/m² for SPV660-TG12-132BD
Open-circuit voltage
45.70 V
46.10 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
37.90 V
38.81 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
11.60 A
17.84 A
6.24 A apart
Current at max power
11.09 A
17.01 A
5.92 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.390 %/°C
-0.300 %/°C
+0.090 %/°C for SPV660-TG12-132BD
Mechanical
Dimensions
1957x1079x35 mm
2383x1302x30 mm
1957x1079x35 mm vs 2383x1302x30 mm
Module area
2.112 m²
3.103 m²
0.991 m² apart
Weight
21.7 kg
38.0 kg
-16.3 kg for PowerXT 420R-PL
Weight per kWp
51.7 kg/kWp
57.6 kg/kWp
-5.9 kg/kWp for PowerXT 420R-PL
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
30 yrs
12 yrs
+18 yrs for PowerXT 420R-PL
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.48 %/yr
-
Not published by Solaria
Technology
Cell technology
-
TOPCon
Not published by Solaria
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
-
132
Not published by Solaria
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#12,331
vs
#8,795
SPV660-TG12-132BD leads by 3,536 places
Power density
#12,344
vs
#8,718
SPV660-TG12-132BD leads by 3,626 places
Heat behaviour
#13,579
vs
#6,093
SPV660-TG12-132BD leads by 7,486 places
Weight
#5,023
vs
#11,284
PowerXT 420R-PL leads by 6,261 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#9,324
vs
#3,149
SPV660-TG12-132BD leads by 6,175 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Solaria
Solaria PowerXT 420R-PL vs Solaria PowerXT 430R-PL
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Solaria
Solaria PowerXT 420R-PL vs Solaria Solaria PowerXT-430C-PD
9 differences, the largest is performance warranty
Same series, other bin
Solaria
Solaria PowerXT 420R-PL vs Solaria Solaria PowerXT-420C-BD
10 differences, the largest is performance warranty
Same series, other bin
Solaria
Solaria PowerXT 420R-PL vs Solaria Solaria PowerXT-420C-PD
9 differences, the largest is performance warranty
Same series, other bin
Solaria
Solaria PowerXT 420R-PL vs Solaria Solaria PowerXT-410C-BD
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Solaria
Solaria PowerXT 420R-PL vs Solaria Solaria PowerX-400R
13 differences, the largest is performance warranty
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Solaria PowerXT 420R-PL or Solaria SPV660-TG12-132BD?
According to our database: Solaria SPV660-TG12-132BD has higher module efficiency (21.28% vs 19.90%); Solaria SPV660-TG12-132BD tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.300%/°C vs -0.390%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Solaria PowerXT 420R-PL and Solaria SPV660-TG12-132BD?
Solaria PowerXT 420R-PL has a module efficiency of 19.90%, while Solaria SPV660-TG12-132BD is 21.28%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Solaria PowerXT 420R-PL use vs Solaria SPV660-TG12-132BD?
Solaria PowerXT 420R-PL uses Monocrystalline cells; Solaria SPV660-TG12-132BD uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Solaria PowerXT 420R-PL and Solaria SPV660-TG12-132BD?
Solaria PowerXT 420R-PL has a 30 years power warranty; Solaria SPV660-TG12-132BD has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Solaria PowerXT 420R-PL and Solaria SPV660-TG12-132BD bifacial panels?
Solaria SPV660-TG12-132BD is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Solaria PowerXT 420R-PL is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 1 Solaria offer
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.