Skip to main content
520-XM-BIFACIAL vs 630 XL 9 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Silfab SIL-520-XM-BIFACIAL vs Silfab SIL-630 XL

Silfab
SIL-520-XM-BIFACIAL
520 Wp 21.90 % N-type Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Silfab
SIL-630 XL
630 Wp 22.56 % N-type Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

630 XL leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.66 pp more efficient. 9 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 10 differences
How alike are they
9 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

10 of 19 parameters
Parameter 520-XM-BIFACIAL 630 XL Difference
Module efficiency 21.90 % 22.56 % 0.66 pp more efficient
Rated power 520 Wp 630 Wp 110 W more power
Weight 26.2 kg 29.5 kg 3.3 kg lighter
Power density 218.8 Wp/m² 225.6 Wp/m² 6.8 Wp/m² higher
Open-circuit voltage 47.52 V 57.49 V 9.97 V apart
Module area 2.377 m² 2.793 m² 0.416 m² apart
Weight per kWp 50.4 kg/kWp 46.8 kg/kWp 3.6 kg/kWp lighter
Voltage at max power 40.48 V 48.47 V 7.99 V apart
Cell count 132 156 24 cells apart
Dimensions 2098x1133x35 mm 2465x1133x35 mm 2098x1133x35 mm vs 2465x1133x35 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
520-XM-BIFACIAL
17,531 kWh
630 XL
21,240 kWh
Lifetime gap
3,709 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 520-XM-BIFACIAL 630 XL
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 520 W 630 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 497 W 603 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 475 W 575 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 452 W 548 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 520-XM-BIFACIAL 630 XL Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 520 Wp 630 Wp +110 W for 630 XL
Module efficiency 21.90 % 22.56 % +0.66 pp for 630 XL
Power density 218.8 Wp/m² 225.6 Wp/m² +6.8 Wp/m² for 630 XL
Open-circuit voltage 47.52 V 57.49 V 9.97 V apart
Voltage at max power 40.48 V 48.47 V 7.99 V apart
Short-circuit current 13.65 A 13.66 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 12.85 A 13.00 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2098x1133x35 mm 2465x1133x35 mm 2098x1133x35 mm vs 2465x1133x35 mm
Module area 2.377 m² 2.793 m² 0.416 m² apart
Weight 26.2 kg 29.5 kg -3.3 kg for 520-XM-BIFACIAL
Weight per kWp 50.4 kg/kWp 46.8 kg/kWp -3.6 kg/kWp for 630 XL
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.30 %/yr 0.30 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology N-type N-type Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 156 24 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#6,783 vs #3,899
630 XL leads by 2,884 places
Power density
#6,837 vs #3,867
630 XL leads by 2,970 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#3,761 vs #1,365
630 XL leads by 2,396 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#4,485 vs #1,032
630 XL leads by 3,453 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Silfab
Silfab SIL-520-XM-BIFACIAL vs Silfab SIL-580-XM+-BIFACIAL
9 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Silfab
Silfab SIL-520-XM-BIFACIAL vs Silfab SIL-570 XM+ BIFACIAL
8 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Silfab
Silfab SIL-520-XM-BIFACIAL vs Silfab SIL-540-XM-BIFACIAL
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Silfab
Silfab SIL-520-XM-BIFACIAL vs Silfab SIL-520 XM BIFACIAL
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Silfab
Silfab SIL-630 XL vs Silfab SIL-640 XL
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Silfab
Silfab SIL-630 XL vs Silfab SIL-620 XL
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Silfab SIL-520-XM-BIFACIAL or Silfab SIL-630 XL?
According to our database: Silfab SIL-630 XL has higher module efficiency (22.56% vs 21.90%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Silfab SIL-520-XM-BIFACIAL and Silfab SIL-630 XL?
Silfab SIL-520-XM-BIFACIAL has a module efficiency of 21.90%, while Silfab SIL-630 XL is 22.56%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Silfab SIL-520-XM-BIFACIAL use vs Silfab SIL-630 XL?
Silfab SIL-520-XM-BIFACIAL uses N-type cells; Silfab SIL-630 XL uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Silfab SIL-520-XM-BIFACIAL and Silfab SIL-630 XL?
Silfab SIL-520-XM-BIFACIAL has a 30 years power warranty; Silfab SIL-630 XL has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Silfab SIL-520-XM-BIFACIAL and Silfab SIL-630 XL bifacial panels?
Both Silfab SIL-520-XM-BIFACIAL and Silfab SIL-630 XL are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 2 Silfab offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.