Shinson Technology S715M66HT4BF vs Shinson Technology S695M66NT4BF
VS
The verdict
S715M66HT4BF leads on the differences that matter
The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.050 %/°C better in heat. 9 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 10 differencesHow alike are they
9
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
10 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
S715M66HT4BF
S695M66NT4BF
Difference
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.310 %/°C
0.050 %/°C better in heat
Module efficiency
23.02 %
22.37 %
0.65 pp more efficient
Power density
230.2 Wp/m²
223.7 Wp/m²
6.4 Wp/m² higher
Rated power
715 Wp
695 Wp
20 W more power
Open-circuit voltage
50.59 V
47.07 V
3.52 V apart
Cell technology
HJT
TOPCon
HJT vs TOPCon
Short-circuit current
17.61 A
18.84 A
1.23 A apart
Annual degradation
0.35 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
0.05 %/yr slower
Voltage at max power
42.54 V
39.13 V
3.41 V apart
Current at max power
16.81 A
17.76 A
0.95 A apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Declared annual degradation, with a 1.0% first-year loss assumed for both panels because at least one datasheet omits it, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
S715M66HT4BF
24,176 kWh
S695M66NT4BF
23,319 kWh
Lifetime gap
857 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
S715M66HT4BF
S695M66NT4BF
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
715 W
695 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.3% of rated power
687 W
663 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
90.7% of rated power
659 W
630 W
Hot roof
70 °C
86.0% of rated power
631 W
598 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
S715M66HT4BF
S695M66NT4BF
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
715 Wp
695 Wp
+20 W for S715M66HT4BF
Module efficiency
23.02 %
22.37 %
+0.65 pp for S715M66HT4BF
Power density
230.2 Wp/m²
223.7 Wp/m²
+6.4 Wp/m² for S715M66HT4BF
Open-circuit voltage
50.59 V
47.07 V
3.52 V apart
Voltage at max power
42.54 V
39.13 V
3.41 V apart
Short-circuit current
17.61 A
18.84 A
1.23 A apart
Current at max power
16.81 A
17.76 A
0.95 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.310 %/°C
+0.050 %/°C for S715M66HT4BF
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x35 mm
2384x1303x35 mm
Same
Module area
3.106 m²
3.106 m²
Same
Weight
38.7 kg
38.0 kg
Effectively the same
Weight per kWp
54.1 kg/kWp
54.7 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.35 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
-0.05 %/yr for S715M66HT4BF
Technology
Cell technology
HJT
TOPCon
HJT vs TOPCon
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
132
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#1,797
vs
#4,970
S715M66HT4BF leads by 3,173 places
Power density
#2,018
vs
#4,877
S715M66HT4BF leads by 2,859 places
Heat behaviour
#511
vs
#8,005
S715M66HT4BF leads by 7,494 places
Weight
#8,339
vs
#9,072
S715M66HT4BF leads by 733 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#43
vs
#146
S715M66HT4BF leads by 103 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Shinson Technology
Shinson Technology S715M66HT4BF vs Shinson Technology S720M66HT4BF
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Shinson Technology
Shinson Technology S715M66HT4BF vs Shinson Technology S710M66HT4BF
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Shinson Technology
Shinson Technology S715M66HT4BF vs Shinson Technology S705M66HT4BF
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Shinson Technology
Shinson Technology S715M66HT4BF vs Shinson Technology S700M66NT4BF
10 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Shinson Technology
Shinson Technology S715M66HT4BF vs Shinson Technology S700M66HT4BF
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Shinson Technology
Shinson Technology S715M66HT4BF vs Shinson Technology S690M66NT4BF
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Shinson Technology S715M66HT4BF or Shinson Technology S695M66NT4BF?
According to our database: Shinson Technology S715M66HT4BF has higher module efficiency (23.02% vs 22.37%); Shinson Technology S715M66HT4BF tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.310%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Shinson Technology S715M66HT4BF and Shinson Technology S695M66NT4BF?
Shinson Technology S715M66HT4BF has a module efficiency of 23.02%, while Shinson Technology S695M66NT4BF is 22.37%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Shinson Technology S715M66HT4BF use vs Shinson Technology S695M66NT4BF?
Shinson Technology S715M66HT4BF uses HJT cells; Shinson Technology S695M66NT4BF uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Shinson Technology S715M66HT4BF and Shinson Technology S695M66NT4BF?
Shinson Technology S715M66HT4BF has a 30 years power warranty; Shinson Technology S695M66NT4BF has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Shinson Technology S715M66HT4BF and Shinson Technology S695M66NT4BF bifacial panels?
Both Shinson Technology S715M66HT4BF and Shinson Technology S695M66NT4BF are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.