Skip to main content
NB-JD580 vs GSD8K66H-740WT 6 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

Sharp NB-JD580 vs Sharp GSD8K66H-740WT

Sharp
NB-JD580
580 Wp 22.45 % TOPCon Bifacial Incomplete
VS
Sharp GSD8K66H-740WT
Sharp
GSD8K66H-740WT
740 Wp 23.82 % HJT Bifacial
The verdict

GSD8K66H-740WT leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.37 pp more efficient. 6 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 12 differences
How alike are they
6 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

12 of 18 parameters
Parameter NB-JD580 GSD8K66H-740WT Difference
Module efficiency 22.45 % 23.82 % 1.37 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.260 %/°C 0.040 %/°C better in heat
Rated power 580 Wp 740 Wp 160 W more power
Power density 224.5 Wp/m² 238.2 Wp/m² 13.7 Wp/m² higher
Weight 32.5 kg 39.0 kg 6.5 kg lighter
Short-circuit current 14.03 A 17.76 A 3.73 A apart
Module area 2.583 m² 3.106 m² 0.523 m² apart
Cell technology TOPCon HJT TOPCon vs HJT
Weight per kWp 56.0 kg/kWp 52.7 kg/kWp 3.3 kg/kWp lighter
Current at max power 13.43 A 16.91 A 3.48 A apart
Cell count 144 132 12 cells apart
Dimensions 2278x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x35 mm 2278x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
NB-JD580
19,460 kWh
GSD8K66H-740WT
24,828 kWh
Lifetime gap
5,368 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario NB-JD580 GSD8K66H-740WT
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 580 W 740 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 554 W 711 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 528 W 682 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 502 W 653 W
03

Full specification

Parameter NB-JD580 GSD8K66H-740WT Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 580 Wp 740 Wp +160 W for GSD8K66H-740WT
Module efficiency 22.45 % 23.82 % +1.37 pp for GSD8K66H-740WT
Power density 224.5 Wp/m² 238.2 Wp/m² +13.7 Wp/m² for GSD8K66H-740WT
Open-circuit voltage 52.55 V 51.70 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 43.19 V 43.80 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 14.03 A 17.76 A 3.73 A apart
Current at max power 13.43 A 16.91 A 3.48 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.260 %/°C +0.040 %/°C for GSD8K66H-740WT
Mechanical
Dimensions 2278x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x35 mm 2278x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
Module area 2.583 m² 3.106 m² 0.523 m² apart
Weight 32.5 kg 39.0 kg -6.5 kg for NB-JD580
Weight per kWp 56.0 kg/kWp 52.7 kg/kWp -3.3 kg/kWp for GSD8K66H-740WT
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation - 0.35 %/yr Not published by Sharp
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon HJT TOPCon vs HJT
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 132 12 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#4,620 vs #418
GSD8K66H-740WT leads by 4,202 places
Power density
#4,547 vs #431
GSD8K66H-740WT leads by 4,116 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093 vs #511
GSD8K66H-740WT leads by 5,582 places
Weight
#10,343 vs #6,344
GSD8K66H-740WT leads by 3,999 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#2,056 vs #12
GSD8K66H-740WT leads by 2,044 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Sharp
Sharp NB-JD580 vs Sharp NB-JD575
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Sharp
Sharp NB-JD580 vs Sharp NB-JD570
4 differences, the largest is product warranty
Same series, other bin
Sharp
Sharp GSD8K66H-740WT vs Sharp GSD8K66H-735WT
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Sharp
Sharp GSD8K66H-740WT vs Sharp GSD8K66H-730WT
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Sharp
Sharp GSD8K66H-740WT vs Sharp GSD8K66H-725WT
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Sharp
Sharp GSD8K66H-740WT vs Sharp GSD8K66H-720WT
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Sharp NB-JD580 or Sharp GSD8K66H-740WT?
According to our database: Sharp GSD8K66H-740WT has higher module efficiency (23.82% vs 22.45%); Sharp GSD8K66H-740WT tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.300%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Sharp NB-JD580 and Sharp GSD8K66H-740WT?
Sharp NB-JD580 has a module efficiency of 22.45%, while Sharp GSD8K66H-740WT is 23.82%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Sharp NB-JD580 use vs Sharp GSD8K66H-740WT?
Sharp NB-JD580 uses TOPCon cells; Sharp GSD8K66H-740WT uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Sharp NB-JD580 and Sharp GSD8K66H-740WT?
Sharp NB-JD580 has a 30 years power warranty; Sharp GSD8K66H-740WT has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Sharp NB-JD580 and Sharp GSD8K66H-740WT bifacial panels?
Both Sharp NB-JD580 and Sharp GSD8K66H-740WT are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 6 Sharp offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.