Skip to main content
700-BTC-BG vs 695-BTC-BG 19 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Seraphim SRP-700-BTC-BG vs Seraphim SRP-695-BTC-BG

Seraphim SRP-700-BTC-BG
SRP-700-BTC-BG
700 Wp 22.53 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Seraphim SRP-695-BTC-BG
SRP-695-BTC-BG
695 Wp 22.37 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

Identical on every published parameter

All 19 comparable parameters agree. Two records this alike are usually one panel sold under two names, or two bins of the same production line - decide on price and on who you would rather buy from.

How alike are they
19 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

0 of 19 parameters

Every comparable parameter agrees. The full specification is below.

02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
700-BTC-BG
23,486 kWh
695-BTC-BG
23,319 kWh
Lifetime gap
167 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 700-BTC-BG 695-BTC-BG
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 700 W 695 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 670 W 665 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 639 W 635 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 609 W 604 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 700-BTC-BG 695-BTC-BG Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 700 Wp 695 Wp Effectively the same
Module efficiency 22.53 % 22.37 % Effectively the same
Power density 225.3 Wp/m² 223.7 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 48.50 V 48.30 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 40.53 V 40.33 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 18.32 A 18.28 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 17.28 A 17.24 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2384x1303x33 mm Same
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 38.5 kg 38.5 kg Same
Weight per kWp 55.0 kg/kWp 55.4 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#3,982 vs #4,970
700-BTC-BG leads by 988 places
Power density
#3,989 vs #4,877
700-BTC-BG leads by 888 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#9,361 vs #9,818
700-BTC-BG leads by 457 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#928 vs #1,117
700-BTC-BG leads by 189 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Seraphim SRP-700-BTC-BG vs Seraphim SRP-720-BTC-BG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Seraphim SRP-700-BTC-BG vs Seraphim SRP-715-BTC-BG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Seraphim SRP-700-BTC-BG vs Seraphim SRP-710-BTC-BG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Seraphim SRP-700-BTC-BG vs Seraphim SRP-705-BTC-BG
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Seraphim SRP-700-BTC-BG vs Seraphim SRP-690-BTC-BG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Seraphim SRP-700-BTC-BG vs Seraphim SRP-685-BTC-BG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Seraphim SRP-700-BTC-BG or Seraphim SRP-695-BTC-BG?
According to our database: Seraphim SRP-700-BTC-BG has higher module efficiency (22.53% vs 22.37%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Seraphim SRP-700-BTC-BG and Seraphim SRP-695-BTC-BG?
Seraphim SRP-700-BTC-BG has a module efficiency of 22.53%, while Seraphim SRP-695-BTC-BG is 22.37%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Seraphim SRP-700-BTC-BG use vs Seraphim SRP-695-BTC-BG?
Seraphim SRP-700-BTC-BG uses TOPCon cells; Seraphim SRP-695-BTC-BG uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Seraphim SRP-700-BTC-BG and Seraphim SRP-695-BTC-BG?
Seraphim SRP-700-BTC-BG has a 30 years power warranty; Seraphim SRP-695-BTC-BG has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Seraphim SRP-700-BTC-BG and Seraphim SRP-695-BTC-BG bifacial panels?
Both Seraphim SRP-700-BTC-BG and Seraphim SRP-695-BTC-BG are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 4 Seraphim offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.