Skip to main content
630-BTZ-BG vs 715-BTC-BG 8 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Seraphim SRP-630-BTZ-BG vs Seraphim SRP-715-BTC-BG

Seraphim SRP-630-BTZ-BG
SRP-630-BTZ-BG
630 Wp 22.54 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Seraphim SRP-715-BTC-BG
SRP-715-BTC-BG
715 Wp 23.02 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

715-BTC-BG leads on the differences that matter

The largest is rated power: 85 W more power. 8 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 11 differences
How alike are they
8 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

11 of 19 parameters
Parameter 630-BTZ-BG 715-BTC-BG Difference
Rated power 630 Wp 715 Wp 85 W more power
Module efficiency 22.54 % 23.02 % 0.48 pp more efficient
Weight 34.6 kg 38.5 kg 3.9 kg lighter
Open-circuit voltage 56.44 V 49.10 V 7.34 V apart
Short-circuit current 14.07 A 18.44 A 4.37 A apart
Module area 2.795 m² 3.106 m² 0.311 m² apart
Power density 225.4 Wp/m² 230.2 Wp/m² 4.8 Wp/m² higher
Voltage at max power 47.13 V 41.13 V 6.00 V apart
Current at max power 13.37 A 17.39 A 4.02 A apart
Cell count 156 132 24 cells apart
Dimensions 2465x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2465x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
630-BTZ-BG
21,138 kWh
715-BTC-BG
23,990 kWh
Lifetime gap
2,852 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 630-BTZ-BG 715-BTC-BG
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 630 W 715 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 603 W 684 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 575 W 653 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 548 W 622 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 630-BTZ-BG 715-BTC-BG Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 630 Wp 715 Wp +85 W for 715-BTC-BG
Module efficiency 22.54 % 23.02 % +0.48 pp for 715-BTC-BG
Power density 225.4 Wp/m² 230.2 Wp/m² +4.8 Wp/m² for 715-BTC-BG
Open-circuit voltage 56.44 V 49.10 V 7.34 V apart
Voltage at max power 47.13 V 41.13 V 6.00 V apart
Short-circuit current 14.07 A 18.44 A 4.37 A apart
Current at max power 13.37 A 17.39 A 4.02 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2465x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2465x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area 2.795 m² 3.106 m² 0.311 m² apart
Weight 34.6 kg 38.5 kg -3.9 kg for 630-BTZ-BG
Weight per kWp 54.9 kg/kWp 53.8 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 156 132 24 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#3,920 vs #1,797
715-BTC-BG leads by 2,123 places
Power density
#3,907 vs #2,018
715-BTC-BG leads by 1,889 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#9,305 vs #7,897
715-BTC-BG leads by 1,408 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#2,179 vs #471
715-BTC-BG leads by 1,708 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Seraphim SRP-630-BTZ-BG vs Seraphim SRP-720-BTC-BG
11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Seraphim SRP-630-BTZ-BG vs Seraphim SRP-710-BTC-BG
11 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Seraphim SRP-630-BTZ-BG vs Seraphim SRP-705-BTC-BG
9 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Seraphim SRP-630-BTZ-BG vs Seraphim SRP-700-BTC-BG
9 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Seraphim SRP-630-BTZ-BG vs Seraphim SRP-695-BTC-BG
9 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Seraphim SRP-630-BTZ-BG vs Seraphim SRP-690-BTC-BG
11 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Seraphim SRP-630-BTZ-BG or Seraphim SRP-715-BTC-BG?
According to our database: Seraphim SRP-715-BTC-BG has higher module efficiency (23.02% vs 22.54%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Seraphim SRP-630-BTZ-BG and Seraphim SRP-715-BTC-BG?
Seraphim SRP-630-BTZ-BG has a module efficiency of 22.54%, while Seraphim SRP-715-BTC-BG is 23.02%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Seraphim SRP-630-BTZ-BG use vs Seraphim SRP-715-BTC-BG?
Seraphim SRP-630-BTZ-BG uses TOPCon cells; Seraphim SRP-715-BTC-BG uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Seraphim SRP-630-BTZ-BG and Seraphim SRP-715-BTC-BG?
Seraphim SRP-630-BTZ-BG has a 30 years power warranty; Seraphim SRP-715-BTC-BG has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Seraphim SRP-630-BTZ-BG and Seraphim SRP-715-BTC-BG bifacial panels?
Both Seraphim SRP-630-BTZ-BG and Seraphim SRP-715-BTC-BG are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 4 Seraphim offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.