Seraphim SEG-490-BTB-BG vs Seraphim SEG-465-BTB-BG
VS
The verdict
490-BTB-BG leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 1.15 pp more efficient. 11 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 8 differencesHow alike are they
11
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
8 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
490-BTB-BG
465-BTB-BG
Difference
Module efficiency
22.63 %
21.48 %
1.15 pp more efficient
Power density
226.3 Wp/m²
214.8 Wp/m²
11.5 Wp/m² higher
Rated power
490 Wp
465 Wp
25 W more power
Cell technology
N-type
TOPCon
N-type vs TOPCon
Weight per kWp
55.7 kg/kWp
58.7 kg/kWp
3.0 kg/kWp lighter
Annual degradation
0.34 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
0.06 %/yr slower
Open-circuit voltage
43.60 V
42.60 V
1.00 V apart
Voltage at max power
36.40 V
35.40 V
1.00 V apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
490-BTB-BG
16,475 kWh
465-BTB-BG
15,334 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,141 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
490-BTB-BG
465-BTB-BG
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
490 W
465 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.5% of rated power
468 W
444 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.0% of rated power
446 W
423 W
Hot roof
70 °C
86.5% of rated power
424 W
402 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
490-BTB-BG
465-BTB-BG
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
490 Wp
465 Wp
+25 W for 490-BTB-BG
Module efficiency
22.63 %
21.48 %
+1.15 pp for 490-BTB-BG
Power density
226.3 Wp/m²
214.8 Wp/m²
+11.5 Wp/m² for 490-BTB-BG
Open-circuit voltage
43.60 V
42.60 V
1.00 V apart
Voltage at max power
36.40 V
35.40 V
1.00 V apart
Short-circuit current
14.14 A
13.82 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
13.46 A
13.14 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.300 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
1909x1134x30 mm
1909x1134x30 mm
Same
Module area
2.165 m²
2.165 m²
Same
Weight
27.3 kg
27.3 kg
Same
Weight per kWp
55.7 kg/kWp
58.7 kg/kWp
-3.0 kg/kWp for 490-BTB-BG
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
15 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.34 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
-0.06 %/yr for 490-BTB-BG
Technology
Cell technology
N-type
TOPCon
N-type vs TOPCon
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
120
120
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#3,622
vs
#8,152
490-BTB-BG leads by 4,530 places
Power density
#3,660
vs
#8,116
490-BTB-BG leads by 4,456 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093
vs
#6,093
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#10,113
vs
#11,841
490-BTB-BG leads by 1,728 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#6,850
vs
#9,185
490-BTB-BG leads by 2,335 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Seraphim SEG-490-BTB-BG vs Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Seraphim SEG-490-BTB-BG vs Seraphim SEG-485-BTB-BG
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Seraphim SEG-490-BTB-BG vs Seraphim SEG-480-BTB-BG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Seraphim SEG-490-BTB-BG vs Seraphim SEG-475-BTB-BG
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Seraphim SEG-490-BTB-BG vs Seraphim SEG-470-BTB-BG
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Seraphim SEG-490-BTB-BG vs Seraphim SRP-730-BHC-BG
14 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Seraphim SEG-490-BTB-BG or Seraphim SEG-465-BTB-BG?
According to our database: Seraphim SEG-490-BTB-BG has higher module efficiency (22.63% vs 21.48%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Seraphim SEG-490-BTB-BG and Seraphim SEG-465-BTB-BG?
Seraphim SEG-490-BTB-BG has a module efficiency of 22.63%, while Seraphim SEG-465-BTB-BG is 21.48%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Seraphim SEG-490-BTB-BG use vs Seraphim SEG-465-BTB-BG?
Seraphim SEG-490-BTB-BG uses N-type cells; Seraphim SEG-465-BTB-BG uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Seraphim SEG-490-BTB-BG and Seraphim SEG-465-BTB-BG?
Seraphim SEG-490-BTB-BG has a 30 years power warranty; Seraphim SEG-465-BTB-BG has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Seraphim SEG-490-BTB-BG and Seraphim SEG-465-BTB-BG bifacial panels?
Both Seraphim SEG-490-BTB-BG and Seraphim SEG-465-BTB-BG are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 4 Seraphim offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.