Skip to main content
Plus-735 vs 705 15 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-735 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-705

Runergy
HY-DH132H10-Plus-735
735 Wp 23.70 % HJT Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Runergy
HY-DH132H10-705
705 Wp 22.70 % HJT Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

Plus-735 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.00 pp more efficient. 15 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 4 differences
How alike are they
15 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

4 of 19 parameters
Parameter Plus-735 705 Difference
Module efficiency 23.70 % 22.70 % 1.00 pp more efficient
Power density 236.6 Wp/m² 227.0 Wp/m² 9.7 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 735 Wp 705 Wp 30 W more power
Dimensions 2384x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2384x1303x35 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.260 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
Plus-735
24,737 kWh
705
23,728 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,009 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario Plus-735 705
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 735 W 705 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 96.1% of rated power 706 W 678 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 92.2% of rated power 678 W 650 W
Hot roof 70 °C 88.3% of rated power 649 W 623 W
03

Full specification

Parameter Plus-735 705 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 735 Wp 705 Wp +30 W for Plus-735
Module efficiency 23.70 % 22.70 % +1.00 pp for Plus-735
Power density 236.6 Wp/m² 227.0 Wp/m² +9.7 Wp/m² for Plus-735
Open-circuit voltage 51.19 V 50.29 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 43.11 V 42.25 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 17.85 A 17.49 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 17.05 A 16.69 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.260 %/°C -0.260 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2384x1303x35 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 38.5 kg 38.3 kg Effectively the same
Weight per kWp 52.4 kg/kWp 54.3 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.38 %/yr 0.38 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology HJT HJT Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#517 vs #3,307
Plus-735 leads by 2,790 places
Power density
#582 vs #3,361
Plus-735 leads by 2,779 places
Heat behaviour
#511 vs #511
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#5,859 vs #8,604
Plus-735 leads by 2,745 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#238 vs #1,007
Plus-735 leads by 769 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-735 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-740
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-735 vs Runergy HY-DH132N10-730
6 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-735 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-730
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-735 vs Runergy HY-DH132N10-725
8 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-735 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-725
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-735 vs Runergy HY-DH132N10-720
8 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-735 or Runergy HY-DH132H10-705?
According to our database: Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-735 has higher module efficiency (23.70% vs 22.70%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-735 and Runergy HY-DH132H10-705?
Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-735 has a module efficiency of 23.70%, while Runergy HY-DH132H10-705 is 22.70%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-735 use vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-705?
Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-735 uses HJT cells; Runergy HY-DH132H10-705 uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-735 and Runergy HY-DH132H10-705?
Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-735 has a 30 years power warranty; Runergy HY-DH132H10-705 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-735 and Runergy HY-DH132H10-705 bifacial panels?
Both Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-735 and Runergy HY-DH132H10-705 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 4 Runergy offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.