Skip to main content
DH132H10-740 vs DH108N11-525 7 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Runergy HY-DH132H10-740 vs Runergy HY-DH108N11-525

Runergy
HY-DH132H10-740
740 Wp 23.80 % HJT Bifacial
Open panel page
VS
Runergy
HY-DH108N11-525
525 Wp 23.60 % N-type Bifacial
Open panel page
The verdict

DH132H10-740 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is rated power: 215 W more power. 7 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 12 differences
How alike are they
7 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

12 of 19 parameters
Parameter DH132H10-740 DH108N11-525 Difference
Rated power 740 Wp 525 Wp 215 W more power
Temperature coefficient -0.260 %/°C -0.290 %/°C 0.030 %/°C better in heat
Weight 38.3 kg 27.5 kg 10.8 kg lighter
Open-circuit voltage 51.34 V 41.49 V 9.85 V apart
Module area 3.106 m² 2.224 m² 0.883 m² apart
Short-circuit current 17.91 A 16.08 A 1.83 A apart
Cell technology HJT N-type HJT vs N-type
Module efficiency 23.80 % 23.60 % 0.20 pp more efficient
Voltage at max power 43.25 V 34.27 V 8.98 V apart
Cell count 132 108 24 cells apart
Current at max power 17.11 A 15.32 A 1.79 A apart
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 1961x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 1961x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
DH132H10-740
24,906 kWh
DH108N11-525
17,615 kWh
Lifetime gap
7,291 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario DH132H10-740 DH108N11-525
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 740 W 525 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 711 W 502 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 682 W 479 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 653 W 456 W
03

Full specification

Parameter DH132H10-740 DH108N11-525 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 740 Wp 525 Wp +215 W for DH132H10-740
Module efficiency 23.80 % 23.60 % +0.20 pp for DH132H10-740
Power density 238.2 Wp/m² 236.1 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 51.34 V 41.49 V 9.85 V apart
Voltage at max power 43.25 V 34.27 V 8.98 V apart
Short-circuit current 17.91 A 16.08 A 1.83 A apart
Current at max power 17.11 A 15.32 A 1.79 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.260 %/°C -0.290 %/°C +0.030 %/°C for DH132H10-740
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 1961x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 1961x1134x30 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 2.224 m² 0.883 m² apart
Weight 38.3 kg 27.5 kg -10.8 kg for DH108N11-525
Weight per kWp 51.8 kg/kWp 52.4 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.38 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Effectively the same
Technology
Cell technology HJT N-type HJT vs N-type
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 108 24 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

13,953 panels
Efficiency
#429 vs #621
DH132H10-740 leads by 192 places
Power density
#427 vs #639
DH132H10-740 leads by 212 places
Heat behaviour
#511 vs #2,146
DH132H10-740 leads by 1,635 places
Weight
#5,095 vs #5,824
DH132H10-740 leads by 729 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#178 vs #4,989
DH132H10-740 leads by 4,811 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH132H10-740 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-740
One difference: dimensions
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH132H10-740 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-735
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH132H10-740 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-735
One difference: dimensions
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH132H10-740 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-730
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH132H10-740 vs Runergy HY-DH132N10-730
9 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH132H10-740 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-730
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Runergy HY-DH132H10-740 or Runergy HY-DH108N11-525?
According to our database: Runergy HY-DH132H10-740 has higher module efficiency (23.80% vs 23.60%); Runergy HY-DH132H10-740 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Runergy HY-DH132H10-740 and Runergy HY-DH108N11-525?
Runergy HY-DH132H10-740 has a module efficiency of 23.80%, while Runergy HY-DH108N11-525 is 23.60%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Runergy HY-DH132H10-740 use vs Runergy HY-DH108N11-525?
Runergy HY-DH132H10-740 uses HJT cells; Runergy HY-DH108N11-525 uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Runergy HY-DH132H10-740 and Runergy HY-DH108N11-525?
Runergy HY-DH132H10-740 has a 30 years power warranty; Runergy HY-DH108N11-525 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Runergy HY-DH132H10-740 and Runergy HY-DH108N11-525 bifacial panels?
Both Runergy HY-DH132H10-740 and Runergy HY-DH108N11-525 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 2 Runergy offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.