Skip to main content
715 vs 735 16 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Runergy HY-DH132H10-715 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-735

Runergy
HY-DH132H10-715
715 Wp 23.00 % HJT Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Runergy
HY-DH132H10-735
735 Wp 23.70 % HJT Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

735 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.70 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
16 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

3 of 19 parameters
Parameter 715 735 Difference
Module efficiency 23.00 % 23.70 % 0.70 pp more efficient
Power density 230.2 Wp/m² 236.6 Wp/m² 6.4 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 715 Wp 735 Wp 20 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.260 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
715
24,064 kWh
735
24,737 kWh
Lifetime gap
673 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 715 735
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 715 W 735 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 96.1% of rated power 687 W 706 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 92.2% of rated power 659 W 678 W
Hot roof 70 °C 88.3% of rated power 631 W 649 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 715 735 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 715 Wp 735 Wp +20 W for 735
Module efficiency 23.00 % 23.70 % +0.70 pp for 735
Power density 230.2 Wp/m² 236.6 Wp/m² +6.4 Wp/m² for 735
Open-circuit voltage 50.59 V 51.19 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 42.54 V 43.11 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 17.61 A 17.85 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 16.81 A 17.05 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.260 %/°C -0.260 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2384x1303x33 mm Same
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 38.3 kg 38.3 kg Same
Weight per kWp 53.6 kg/kWp 52.1 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.38 %/yr 0.38 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology HJT HJT Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#1,919 vs #517
735 leads by 1,402 places
Power density
#2,018 vs #582
735 leads by 1,436 places
Heat behaviour
#511 vs #511
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#7,566 vs #5,576
735 leads by 1,990 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#678 vs #233
735 leads by 445 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH132H10-715 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-740
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH132H10-715 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-740
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH132H10-715 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-735
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH132H10-715 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-730
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH132H10-715 vs Runergy HY-DH132N10-730
8 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH132H10-715 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-730
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Runergy HY-DH132H10-715 or Runergy HY-DH132H10-735?
According to our database: Runergy HY-DH132H10-735 has higher module efficiency (23.70% vs 23.00%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Runergy HY-DH132H10-715 and Runergy HY-DH132H10-735?
Runergy HY-DH132H10-715 has a module efficiency of 23.00%, while Runergy HY-DH132H10-735 is 23.70%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Runergy HY-DH132H10-715 use vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-735?
Runergy HY-DH132H10-715 uses HJT cells; Runergy HY-DH132H10-735 uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Runergy HY-DH132H10-715 and Runergy HY-DH132H10-735?
Runergy HY-DH132H10-715 has a 30 years power warranty; Runergy HY-DH132H10-735 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Runergy HY-DH132H10-715 and Runergy HY-DH132H10-735 bifacial panels?
Both Runergy HY-DH132H10-715 and Runergy HY-DH132H10-735 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 4 Runergy offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.