Runergy HY-DH108N8B-435 vs Runergy HY-DH108N8-450
VS
The verdict
DH108N8-450 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.70 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 3 differencesHow alike are they
16
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
3 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
DH108N8B-435
DH108N8-450
Difference
Module efficiency
22.30 %
23.00 %
0.70 pp more efficient
Power density
222.8 Wp/m²
230.4 Wp/m²
7.7 Wp/m² higher
Rated power
435 Wp
450 Wp
15 W more power
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
DH108N8B-435
14,595 kWh
DH108N8-450
15,098 kWh
Lifetime gap
503 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
DH108N8B-435
DH108N8-450
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
435 W
450 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
416 W
430 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
397 W
411 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
378 W
391 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
DH108N8B-435
DH108N8-450
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
435 Wp
450 Wp
+15 W for DH108N8-450
Module efficiency
22.30 %
23.00 %
+0.70 pp for DH108N8-450
Power density
222.8 Wp/m²
230.4 Wp/m²
+7.7 Wp/m² for DH108N8-450
Open-circuit voltage
38.97 V
39.79 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
33.03 V
33.22 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
13.80 A
14.00 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
13.17 A
13.55 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
1722x1134x30 mm
1722x1134x30 mm
Same
Module area
1.953 m²
1.953 m²
Same
Weight
24.2 kg
24.2 kg
Same
Weight per kWp
55.6 kg/kWp
53.8 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
N-type
N-type
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
108
108
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#5,100
vs
#1,919
DH108N8-450 leads by 3,181 places
Power density
#5,150
vs
#1,708
DH108N8-450 leads by 3,442 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165
vs
#2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#10,001
vs
#7,840
DH108N8-450 leads by 2,161 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#9,745
vs
#8,581
DH108N8-450 leads by 1,164 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH108N8B-435 vs Runergy HY-DH108N8B-450
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH108N8B-435 vs Runergy HY-DH108N8B-445
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH108N8B-435 vs Runergy HY-DH108N8-445
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH108N8B-435 vs Runergy HY-DH108N8B-440
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH108N8B-435 vs Runergy HY-DH108N8-440
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH108N8B-435 vs Runergy HY-DH108N8-435
The same specification on paper
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Runergy HY-DH108N8B-435 or Runergy HY-DH108N8-450?
According to our database: Runergy HY-DH108N8-450 has higher module efficiency (23.00% vs 22.30%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Runergy HY-DH108N8B-435 and Runergy HY-DH108N8-450?
Runergy HY-DH108N8B-435 has a module efficiency of 22.30%, while Runergy HY-DH108N8-450 is 23.00%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Runergy HY-DH108N8B-435 use vs Runergy HY-DH108N8-450?
Runergy HY-DH108N8B-435 uses N-type cells; Runergy HY-DH108N8-450 uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Runergy HY-DH108N8B-435 and Runergy HY-DH108N8-450?
Runergy HY-DH108N8B-435 has a 30 years power warranty; Runergy HY-DH108N8-450 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Runergy HY-DH108N8B-435 and Runergy HY-DH108N8-450 bifacial panels?
Both Runergy HY-DH108N8B-435 and Runergy HY-DH108N8-450 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 4 Runergy offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.