Skip to main content
DH108N8-450 vs DH108N8B-450 19 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Runergy HY-DH108N8-450 vs Runergy HY-DH108N8B-450

Runergy HY-DH108N8-450
Runergy
HY-DH108N8-450
450 Wp 23.00 % N-type Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Runergy
HY-DH108N8B-450
450 Wp 23.00 % N-type Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

Identical on every published parameter

All 19 comparable parameters agree. Two records this alike are usually one panel sold under two names, or two bins of the same production line - decide on price and on who you would rather buy from.

How alike are they
19 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

0 of 19 parameters

Every comparable parameter agrees. The full specification is below.

02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
DH108N8-450
15,098 kWh
DH108N8B-450
15,098 kWh
Lifetime gap
No difference
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario DH108N8-450 DH108N8B-450
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 450 W 450 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 430 W 430 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 411 W 411 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 391 W 391 W
03

Full specification

Parameter DH108N8-450 DH108N8B-450 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 450 Wp 450 Wp Same
Module efficiency 23.00 % 23.00 % Same
Power density 230.4 Wp/m² 230.4 Wp/m² Same
Open-circuit voltage 39.79 V 39.79 V Same
Voltage at max power 33.22 V 33.22 V Same
Short-circuit current 14.00 A 14.00 A Same
Current at max power 13.55 A 13.55 A Same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1722x1134x30 mm 1722x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 1.953 m² 1.953 m² Same
Weight 24.2 kg 24.2 kg Same
Weight per kWp 53.8 kg/kWp 53.8 kg/kWp Same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology N-type N-type Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 108 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#1,919 vs #1,919
Tied - the same position in the database
Power density
#1,708 vs #1,708
Tied - the same position in the database
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#7,840 vs #7,840
Tied - the same position in the database
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#8,581 vs #8,581
Tied - the same position in the database
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH108N8-450 vs Runergy HY-DH108N11-530
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH108N8-450 vs Runergy HY-DH108N11-525
10 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH108N8-450 vs Runergy HY-DH108N11-520
9 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH108N8-450 vs Runergy HY-DH108N11-515
8 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH108N8-450 vs Runergy HY-DH108N11-510
6 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH108N8-450 vs Runergy HY-DH108N11-505
8 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Runergy HY-DH108N8-450 or Runergy HY-DH108N8B-450?
According to our database: both panels are closely matched on key specs - the decision often comes down to price and local availability. See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Runergy HY-DH108N8-450 and Runergy HY-DH108N8B-450?
Runergy HY-DH108N8-450 has a module efficiency of 23.00%, while Runergy HY-DH108N8B-450 is 23.00%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Runergy HY-DH108N8-450 use vs Runergy HY-DH108N8B-450?
Runergy HY-DH108N8-450 uses N-type cells; Runergy HY-DH108N8B-450 uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Runergy HY-DH108N8-450 and Runergy HY-DH108N8B-450?
Runergy HY-DH108N8-450 has a 30 years power warranty; Runergy HY-DH108N8B-450 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Runergy HY-DH108N8-450 and Runergy HY-DH108N8B-450 bifacial panels?
Both Runergy HY-DH108N8-450 and Runergy HY-DH108N8B-450 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 4 Runergy offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.