Skip to main content
DH108N8-435 vs DH108N8B-440 18 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Runergy HY-DH108N8-435 vs Runergy HY-DH108N8B-440

Runergy HY-DH108N8-435
Runergy
HY-DH108N8-435
435 Wp 22.30 % N-type Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Runergy
HY-DH108N8B-440
440 Wp 22.50 % N-type Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

DH108N8B-440 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.20 pp more efficient. 18 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See the one difference
How alike are they
18 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

1 of 19 parameters
Parameter DH108N8-435 DH108N8B-440 Difference
Module efficiency 22.30 % 22.50 % 0.20 pp more efficient
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
DH108N8-435
14,595 kWh
DH108N8B-440
14,763 kWh
Lifetime gap
168 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario DH108N8-435 DH108N8B-440
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 435 W 440 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 416 W 421 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 397 W 402 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 378 W 383 W
03

Full specification

Parameter DH108N8-435 DH108N8B-440 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 435 Wp 440 Wp Effectively the same
Module efficiency 22.30 % 22.50 % +0.20 pp for DH108N8B-440
Power density 222.8 Wp/m² 225.3 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 38.97 V 39.16 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 33.03 V 33.21 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 13.80 A 13.88 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.17 A 13.25 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1722x1134x30 mm 1722x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 1.953 m² 1.953 m² Same
Weight 24.2 kg 24.2 kg Same
Weight per kWp 55.6 kg/kWp 55.0 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology N-type N-type Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 108 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#5,100 vs #4,222
DH108N8B-440 leads by 878 places
Power density
#5,150 vs #4,099
DH108N8B-440 leads by 1,051 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#10,001 vs #9,361
DH108N8B-440 leads by 640 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#9,745 vs #9,409
DH108N8B-440 leads by 336 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH108N8-435 vs Runergy HY-DH108N11-530
11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH108N8-435 vs Runergy HY-DH108N11-525
11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH108N8-435 vs Runergy HY-DH108N11-520
11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH108N8-435 vs Runergy HY-DH108N11-515
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH108N8-435 vs Runergy HY-DH108N11-510
9 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH108N8-435 vs Runergy HY-DH108N11-505
9 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Runergy HY-DH108N8-435 or Runergy HY-DH108N8B-440?
According to our database: Runergy HY-DH108N8B-440 has higher module efficiency (22.50% vs 22.30%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Runergy HY-DH108N8-435 and Runergy HY-DH108N8B-440?
Runergy HY-DH108N8-435 has a module efficiency of 22.30%, while Runergy HY-DH108N8B-440 is 22.50%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Runergy HY-DH108N8-435 use vs Runergy HY-DH108N8B-440?
Runergy HY-DH108N8-435 uses N-type cells; Runergy HY-DH108N8B-440 uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Runergy HY-DH108N8-435 and Runergy HY-DH108N8B-440?
Runergy HY-DH108N8-435 has a 30 years power warranty; Runergy HY-DH108N8B-440 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Runergy HY-DH108N8-435 and Runergy HY-DH108N8B-440 bifacial panels?
Both Runergy HY-DH108N8-435 and Runergy HY-DH108N8B-440 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 4 Runergy offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.