Skip to main content
DH108N8-435 vs DH108N8B-435 19 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Runergy HY-DH108N8-435 vs Runergy HY-DH108N8B-435

Runergy HY-DH108N8-435
Runergy
HY-DH108N8-435
435 Wp 22.30 % N-type Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Runergy
HY-DH108N8B-435
435 Wp 22.30 % N-type Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

Identical on every published parameter

All 19 comparable parameters agree. Two records this alike are usually one panel sold under two names, or two bins of the same production line - decide on price and on who you would rather buy from.

How alike are they
19 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

0 of 19 parameters

Every comparable parameter agrees. The full specification is below.

02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
DH108N8-435
14,595 kWh
DH108N8B-435
14,595 kWh
Lifetime gap
No difference
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario DH108N8-435 DH108N8B-435
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 435 W 435 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 416 W 416 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 397 W 397 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 378 W 378 W
03

Full specification

Parameter DH108N8-435 DH108N8B-435 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 435 Wp 435 Wp Same
Module efficiency 22.30 % 22.30 % Same
Power density 222.8 Wp/m² 222.8 Wp/m² Same
Open-circuit voltage 38.97 V 38.97 V Same
Voltage at max power 33.03 V 33.03 V Same
Short-circuit current 13.80 A 13.80 A Same
Current at max power 13.17 A 13.17 A Same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1722x1134x30 mm 1722x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 1.953 m² 1.953 m² Same
Weight 24.2 kg 24.2 kg Same
Weight per kWp 55.6 kg/kWp 55.6 kg/kWp Same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology N-type N-type Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 108 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#5,100 vs #5,100
Tied - the same position in the database
Power density
#5,150 vs #5,150
Tied - the same position in the database
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#10,001 vs #10,001
Tied - the same position in the database
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#9,745 vs #9,745
Tied - the same position in the database
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH108N8-435 vs Runergy HY-DH108N11-530
11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH108N8-435 vs Runergy HY-DH108N11-525
11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH108N8-435 vs Runergy HY-DH108N11-520
11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH108N8-435 vs Runergy HY-DH108N11-515
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH108N8-435 vs Runergy HY-DH108N11-510
9 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH108N8-435 vs Runergy HY-DH108N11-505
9 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Runergy HY-DH108N8-435 or Runergy HY-DH108N8B-435?
According to our database: both panels are closely matched on key specs - the decision often comes down to price and local availability. See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Runergy HY-DH108N8-435 and Runergy HY-DH108N8B-435?
Runergy HY-DH108N8-435 has a module efficiency of 22.30%, while Runergy HY-DH108N8B-435 is 22.30%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Runergy HY-DH108N8-435 use vs Runergy HY-DH108N8B-435?
Runergy HY-DH108N8-435 uses N-type cells; Runergy HY-DH108N8B-435 uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Runergy HY-DH108N8-435 and Runergy HY-DH108N8B-435?
Runergy HY-DH108N8-435 has a 30 years power warranty; Runergy HY-DH108N8B-435 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Runergy HY-DH108N8-435 and Runergy HY-DH108N8B-435 bifacial panels?
Both Runergy HY-DH108N8-435 and Runergy HY-DH108N8B-435 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 4 Runergy offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.