Risen RSM132-8-735BHDG vs Risen RSM96-11-455BNDG
VS
The verdict
RSM132-8-735BHDG leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.90 pp more efficient. 4 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 15 differencesHow alike are they
4
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
15 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
RSM132-8-735BHDG
RSM96-11-455BNDG
Difference
Module efficiency
23.70 %
22.80 %
0.90 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient
-0.240 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
0.050 %/°C better in heat
Rated power
735 Wp
455 Wp
280 W more power
Weight
37.5 kg
21.5 kg
16.0 kg lighter
Power density
236.6 Wp/m²
227.7 Wp/m²
8.9 Wp/m² higher
Annual degradation
0.30 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
0.10 %/yr slower
Open-circuit voltage
50.40 V
35.59 V
14.81 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.47 A
16.22 A
2.25 A apart
Module area
3.106 m²
1.998 m²
1.108 m² apart
Weight per kWp
51.0 kg/kWp
47.3 kg/kWp
3.8 kg/kWp lighter
Cell technology
HJT
TOPCon
HJT vs TOPCon
Voltage at max power
42.26 V
30.10 V
12.16 V apart
Current at max power
17.41 A
15.12 A
2.29 A apart
Cell count
132
96
36 cells apart
Dimensions
2384x1303x33 mm
1762x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
RSM132-8-735BHDG
25,044 kWh
RSM96-11-455BNDG
15,266 kWh
Lifetime gap
9,778 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
RSM132-8-735BHDG
RSM96-11-455BNDG
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
735 W
455 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
709 W
435 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
682 W
415 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
656 W
396 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
RSM132-8-735BHDG
RSM96-11-455BNDG
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
735 Wp
455 Wp
+280 W for RSM132-8-735BHDG
Module efficiency
23.70 %
22.80 %
+0.90 pp for RSM132-8-735BHDG
Power density
236.6 Wp/m²
227.7 Wp/m²
+8.9 Wp/m² for RSM132-8-735BHDG
Open-circuit voltage
50.40 V
35.59 V
14.81 V apart
Voltage at max power
42.26 V
30.10 V
12.16 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.47 A
16.22 A
2.25 A apart
Current at max power
17.41 A
15.12 A
2.29 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.240 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
+0.050 %/°C for RSM132-8-735BHDG
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x33 mm
1762x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm
Module area
3.106 m²
1.998 m²
1.108 m² apart
Weight
37.5 kg
21.5 kg
-16.0 kg for RSM96-11-455BNDG
Weight per kWp
51.0 kg/kWp
47.3 kg/kWp
-3.8 kg/kWp for RSM96-11-455BNDG
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
15 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.30 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
-0.10 %/yr for RSM132-8-735BHDG
Technology
Cell technology
HJT
TOPCon
HJT vs TOPCon
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
96
36 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#517
vs
#2,714
RSM132-8-735BHDG leads by 2,197 places
Power density
#582
vs
#2,888
RSM132-8-735BHDG leads by 2,306 places
Heat behaviour
#13
vs
#2,165
RSM132-8-735BHDG leads by 2,152 places
Weight
#4,360
vs
#1,601
RSM96-11-455BNDG leads by 2,759 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#155
vs
#7,764
RSM132-8-735BHDG leads by 7,609 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Risen RSM132-8-735BHDG vs Risen RSM132-8-745BHDG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Risen RSM132-8-735BHDG vs Risen RSM132-8-740BHDG
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Risen RSM96-11-455BNDG vs Risen RSM96-11-460BNDG
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Risen RSM96-11-455BNDG vs Risen RSM96-11-450BNDG
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Risen RSM96-11-455BNDG vs Risen RSM96-11-445BNDG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Risen RSM96-11-455BNDG vs Risen RSM96-11-440BNDG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Risen RSM132-8-735BHDG or Risen RSM96-11-455BNDG?
According to our database: Risen RSM132-8-735BHDG has higher module efficiency (23.70% vs 22.80%); Risen RSM132-8-735BHDG tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.240%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Risen RSM132-8-735BHDG and Risen RSM96-11-455BNDG?
Risen RSM132-8-735BHDG has a module efficiency of 23.70%, while Risen RSM96-11-455BNDG is 22.80%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Risen RSM132-8-735BHDG use vs Risen RSM96-11-455BNDG?
Risen RSM132-8-735BHDG uses HJT cells; Risen RSM96-11-455BNDG uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Risen RSM132-8-735BHDG and Risen RSM96-11-455BNDG?
Risen RSM132-8-735BHDG has a 30 years power warranty; Risen RSM96-11-455BNDG has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Risen RSM132-8-735BHDG and Risen RSM96-11-455BNDG bifacial panels?
Both Risen RSM132-8-735BHDG and Risen RSM96-11-455BNDG are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 21 Risen offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.