Skip to main content
735BHDG vs 700-715BHDG (700W) 10 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Risen RSM132-8-735BHDG vs Risen RSM132-8-700-715BHDG (700W)

Risen RSM132-8-735BHDG
RSM132-8-735BHDG
735 Wp 23.70 % HJT Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
RSM132-8-700-715BHDG (700W)
700 Wp 22.50 % HJT Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

735BHDG leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.20 pp more efficient. 10 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 9 differences
How alike are they
10 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

9 of 19 parameters
Parameter 735BHDG 700-715BHDG (700W) Difference
Module efficiency 23.70 % 22.50 % 1.20 pp more efficient
Power density 236.6 Wp/m² 225.3 Wp/m² 11.3 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 735 Wp 700 Wp 35 W more power
Weight per kWp 51.0 kg/kWp 57.1 kg/kWp 6.1 kg/kWp lighter
Weight 37.5 kg 40.0 kg 2.5 kg lighter
Annual degradation 0.30 %/yr 0.23 %/yr 0.07 %/yr slower
Short-circuit current 18.47 A 17.82 A 0.65 A apart
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2384x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
Current at max power 17.41 A 16.77 A 0.64 A apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.240 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
735BHDG
25,044 kWh
700-715BHDG (700W)
24,108 kWh
Lifetime gap
936 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 735BHDG 700-715BHDG (700W)
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 735 W 700 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 96.4% of rated power 709 W 675 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 92.8% of rated power 682 W 650 W
Hot roof 70 °C 89.2% of rated power 656 W 624 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 735BHDG 700-715BHDG (700W) Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 735 Wp 700 Wp +35 W for 735BHDG
Module efficiency 23.70 % 22.50 % +1.20 pp for 735BHDG
Power density 236.6 Wp/m² 225.3 Wp/m² +11.3 Wp/m² for 735BHDG
Open-circuit voltage 50.40 V 49.83 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 42.26 V 41.78 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 18.47 A 17.82 A 0.65 A apart
Current at max power 17.41 A 16.77 A 0.64 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.240 %/°C -0.240 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2384x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 37.5 kg 40.0 kg -2.5 kg for 735BHDG
Weight per kWp 51.0 kg/kWp 57.1 kg/kWp -6.1 kg/kWp for 735BHDG
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.30 %/yr 0.23 %/yr -0.07 %/yr for 700-715BHDG (700W)
Technology
Cell technology HJT HJT Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#517 vs #4,222
735BHDG leads by 3,705 places
Power density
#582 vs #3,989
735BHDG leads by 3,407 places
Heat behaviour
#13 vs #13
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#4,360 vs #11,083
735BHDG leads by 6,723 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#155 vs #963
735BHDG leads by 808 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Risen RSM132-8-735BHDG vs Risen RSM132-8-745BHDG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Risen RSM132-8-735BHDG vs Risen RSM132-8-740BHDG
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Risen RSM132-8-700-715BHDG (700W) vs Risen RSM132-8-700-715BHDG (715W)
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Risen RSM132-8-700-715BHDG (700W) vs Risen RSM132-8-700-715BHDG (710W)
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Risen RSM132-8-700-715BHDG (700W) vs Risen RSM132-8-700-715BHDG (705W)
One difference: module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Risen RSM132-8-735BHDG vs Risen RSM132-8-730BHDG
4 differences, the largest is weight
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Risen RSM132-8-735BHDG or Risen RSM132-8-700-715BHDG (700W)?
According to our database: Risen RSM132-8-735BHDG has higher module efficiency (23.70% vs 22.50%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Risen RSM132-8-735BHDG and Risen RSM132-8-700-715BHDG (700W)?
Risen RSM132-8-735BHDG has a module efficiency of 23.70%, while Risen RSM132-8-700-715BHDG (700 W) is 22.50%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Risen RSM132-8-735BHDG use vs Risen RSM132-8-700-715BHDG (700W)?
Risen RSM132-8-735BHDG uses HJT cells; Risen RSM132-8-700-715BHDG (700 W) uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Risen RSM132-8-735BHDG and Risen RSM132-8-700-715BHDG (700W)?
Risen RSM132-8-735BHDG has a 30 years power warranty; Risen RSM132-8-700-715BHDG (700 W) has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Risen RSM132-8-735BHDG and Risen RSM132-8-700-715BHDG (700W) bifacial panels?
Both Risen RSM132-8-735BHDG and Risen RSM132-8-700-715BHDG (700 W) are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 23 Risen offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.