Skip to main content
710BHDG vs 695BHDG 16 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Risen RSM132-8-710BHDG vs Risen RSM132-8-695BHDG

RSM132-8-710BHDG
710 Wp 22.90 % HJT Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
RSM132-8-695BHDG
695 Wp 22.40 % HJT Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

710BHDG leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.50 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
16 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

3 of 19 parameters
Parameter 710BHDG 695BHDG Difference
Module efficiency 22.90 % 22.40 % 0.50 pp more efficient
Power density 228.6 Wp/m² 223.7 Wp/m² 4.8 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 710 Wp 695 Wp 15 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.240 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
710BHDG
24,193 kWh
695BHDG
23,681 kWh
Lifetime gap
512 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 710BHDG 695BHDG
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 710 W 695 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 96.4% of rated power 684 W 670 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 92.8% of rated power 659 W 645 W
Hot roof 70 °C 89.2% of rated power 633 W 620 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 710BHDG 695BHDG Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 710 Wp 695 Wp +15 W for 710BHDG
Module efficiency 22.90 % 22.40 % +0.50 pp for 710BHDG
Power density 228.6 Wp/m² 223.7 Wp/m² +4.8 Wp/m² for 710BHDG
Open-circuit voltage 50.01 V 49.74 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 41.93 V 41.71 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 18.00 A 17.74 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 16.95 A 16.68 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.240 %/°C -0.240 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x30 mm 2384x1303x30 mm Same
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 35.0 kg 35.0 kg Same
Weight per kWp 49.3 kg/kWp 50.4 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.30 %/yr 0.30 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology HJT HJT Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#2,359 vs #4,774
710BHDG leads by 2,415 places
Power density
#2,474 vs #4,877
710BHDG leads by 2,403 places
Heat behaviour
#13 vs #13
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#2,853 vs #3,730
710BHDG leads by 877 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#539 vs #1,062
710BHDG leads by 523 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Risen RSM132-8-710BHDG vs Risen RSM132-8-730BHDG
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Risen RSM132-8-710BHDG vs Risen RSM132-8-725BHDG
6 differences, the largest is weight
Same series, other bin
Risen RSM132-8-710BHDG vs Risen RSM132-8-720BHDG
6 differences, the largest is weight
Same series, other bin
Risen RSM132-8-710BHDG vs Risen RSM132-8-715BHDG
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Risen RSM132-8-710BHDG vs Risen RSM132-8-705BHDG
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Risen RSM132-8-710BHDG vs Risen RSM132-8-700BHDG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Risen RSM132-8-710BHDG or Risen RSM132-8-695BHDG?
According to our database: Risen RSM132-8-710BHDG has higher module efficiency (22.90% vs 22.40%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Risen RSM132-8-710BHDG and Risen RSM132-8-695BHDG?
Risen RSM132-8-710BHDG has a module efficiency of 22.90%, while Risen RSM132-8-695BHDG is 22.40%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Risen RSM132-8-710BHDG use vs Risen RSM132-8-695BHDG?
Risen RSM132-8-710BHDG uses HJT cells; Risen RSM132-8-695BHDG uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Risen RSM132-8-710BHDG and Risen RSM132-8-695BHDG?
Risen RSM132-8-710BHDG has a 30 years power warranty; Risen RSM132-8-695BHDG has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Risen RSM132-8-710BHDG and Risen RSM132-8-695BHDG bifacial panels?
Both Risen RSM132-8-710BHDG and Risen RSM132-8-695BHDG are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 23 Risen offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.