Skip to main content
700BHDG vs 725BHDG 13 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Risen RSM132-8-700BHDG vs Risen RSM132-8-725BHDG

RSM132-8-700BHDG
700 Wp 22.50 % HJT Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
RSM132-8-725BHDG
725 Wp 23.30 % HJT Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

725BHDG leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.80 pp more efficient. 13 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 6 differences
How alike are they
13 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

6 of 19 parameters
Parameter 700BHDG 725BHDG Difference
Module efficiency 22.50 % 23.30 % 0.80 pp more efficient
Weight 35.0 kg 40.0 kg 5.0 kg lighter
Power density 225.3 Wp/m² 233.4 Wp/m² 8.0 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 700 Wp 725 Wp 25 W more power
Weight per kWp 50.0 kg/kWp 55.2 kg/kWp 5.2 kg/kWp lighter
Dimensions 2384x1303x30 mm 2384x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x30 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.240 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
700BHDG
23,852 kWh
725BHDG
24,704 kWh
Lifetime gap
852 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 700BHDG 725BHDG
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 700 W 725 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 96.4% of rated power 675 W 699 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 92.8% of rated power 650 W 673 W
Hot roof 70 °C 89.2% of rated power 624 W 647 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 700BHDG 725BHDG Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 700 Wp 725 Wp +25 W for 725BHDG
Module efficiency 22.50 % 23.30 % +0.80 pp for 725BHDG
Power density 225.3 Wp/m² 233.4 Wp/m² +8.0 Wp/m² for 725BHDG
Open-circuit voltage 49.83 V 50.26 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 41.78 V 42.14 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 17.82 A 18.29 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 16.77 A 17.23 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.240 %/°C -0.240 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x30 mm 2384x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x30 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 35.0 kg 40.0 kg -5.0 kg for 700BHDG
Weight per kWp 50.0 kg/kWp 55.2 kg/kWp -5.2 kg/kWp for 700BHDG
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.30 %/yr 0.30 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology HJT HJT Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#4,222 vs #1,017
725BHDG leads by 3,205 places
Power density
#3,989 vs #936
725BHDG leads by 3,053 places
Heat behaviour
#13 vs #13
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#3,317 vs #9,588
700BHDG leads by 6,271 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#912 vs #271
725BHDG leads by 641 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Risen RSM132-8-700BHDG vs Risen RSM132-8-730BHDG
8 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Risen RSM132-8-700BHDG vs Risen RSM132-8-720BHDG
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Risen RSM132-8-700BHDG vs Risen RSM132-8-715BHDG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Risen RSM132-8-700BHDG vs Risen RSM132-8-710BHDG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Risen RSM132-8-700BHDG vs Risen RSM132-8-705BHDG
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Risen RSM132-8-700BHDG vs Risen RSM132-8-695BHDG
The same specification on paper
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Risen RSM132-8-700BHDG or Risen RSM132-8-725BHDG?
According to our database: Risen RSM132-8-725BHDG has higher module efficiency (23.30% vs 22.50%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Risen RSM132-8-700BHDG and Risen RSM132-8-725BHDG?
Risen RSM132-8-700BHDG has a module efficiency of 22.50%, while Risen RSM132-8-725BHDG is 23.30%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Risen RSM132-8-700BHDG use vs Risen RSM132-8-725BHDG?
Risen RSM132-8-700BHDG uses HJT cells; Risen RSM132-8-725BHDG uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Risen RSM132-8-700BHDG and Risen RSM132-8-725BHDG?
Risen RSM132-8-700BHDG has a 30 years power warranty; Risen RSM132-8-725BHDG has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Risen RSM132-8-700BHDG and Risen RSM132-8-725BHDG bifacial panels?
Both Risen RSM132-8-700BHDG and Risen RSM132-8-725BHDG are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 23 Risen offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.