Skip to main content
M TOPCON-725 vs M-DG-715 12 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-725 vs Resun Solar RS9H-M-DG-715

Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-725
Resun Solar
RS9H-M TOPCON-725
725 Wp 23.34 % TOPCon
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Resun Solar RS9H-M-DG-715
Resun Solar
RS9H-M-DG-715
715 Wp 23.02 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

M TOPCON-725 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is weight: 6.2 kg lighter. 12 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 7 differences
How alike are they
12 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

7 of 19 parameters
Parameter M TOPCON-725 M-DG-715 Difference
Weight 32.3 kg 38.5 kg 6.2 kg lighter
Weight per kWp 44.6 kg/kWp 53.8 kg/kWp 9.3 kg/kWp lighter
Module efficiency 23.34 % 23.02 % 0.32 pp more efficient
Power density 233.4 Wp/m² 230.2 Wp/m² 3.2 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 725 Wp 715 Wp 10 W more power
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
Dimensions 2384x1303x30 mm 2384x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x30 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Declared annual degradation, with a 1.0% first-year loss assumed for both panels because at least one datasheet omits it, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
M TOPCON-725
23,947 kWh
M-DG-715
23,616 kWh
Lifetime gap
331 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario M TOPCON-725 M-DG-715
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 725 W 715 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 692 W 683 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 660 W 651 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 627 W 618 W
03

Full specification

Parameter M TOPCON-725 M-DG-715 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 725 Wp 715 Wp +10 W for M TOPCON-725
Module efficiency 23.34 % 23.02 % +0.32 pp for M TOPCON-725
Power density 233.4 Wp/m² 230.2 Wp/m² +3.2 Wp/m² for M TOPCON-725
Open-circuit voltage 49.60 V 49.20 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 41.50 V 41.10 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 18.54 A 18.44 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 17.47 A 17.40 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.300 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x30 mm 2384x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x30 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 32.3 kg 38.5 kg -6.2 kg for M TOPCON-725
Weight per kWp 44.6 kg/kWp 53.8 kg/kWp -9.3 kg/kWp for M TOPCON-725
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.50 %/yr 0.50 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#943 vs #1,797
M TOPCON-725 leads by 854 places
Power density
#936 vs #2,018
M TOPCON-725 leads by 1,082 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093 vs #6,093
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#473 vs #7,897
M TOPCON-725 leads by 7,424 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#242 vs #471
M TOPCON-725 leads by 229 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Resun Solar
Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-725 vs Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-735
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Resun Solar
Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-725 vs Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-730
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Resun Solar
Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-725 vs Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-720
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Resun Solar
Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-725 vs Resun Solar RS9H-M-720
One difference: dimensions
Same series, other bin
Resun Solar
Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-725 vs Resun Solar RS9H-M-DG-720
4 differences, the largest is weight
Same series, other bin
Resun Solar
Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-725 vs Resun Solar RS9H-M-715
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-725 or Resun Solar RS9H-M-DG-715?
According to our database: Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-725 has higher module efficiency (23.34% vs 23.02%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-725 and Resun Solar RS9H-M-DG-715?
Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-725 has a module efficiency of 23.34%, while Resun Solar RS9H-M-DG-715 is 23.02%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-725 use vs Resun Solar RS9H-M-DG-715?
Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-725 uses TOPCon cells; Resun Solar RS9H-M-DG-715 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-725 and Resun Solar RS9H-M-DG-715?
Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-725 has a 30 years power warranty; Resun Solar RS9H-M-DG-715 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-725 and Resun Solar RS9H-M-DG-715 bifacial panels?
Resun Solar RS9H-M-DG-715 is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-725 is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.