Skip to main content
M-715 vs M TOPCON-720 16 of 17 identical Swap Change panels

Resun Solar RS9H-M-715 vs Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-720

Resun Solar RS9H-M-715
Resun Solar
RS9H-M-715
715 Wp 23.02 % TOPCon Incomplete
VS
Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-720
Resun Solar
RS9H-M TOPCON-720
720 Wp 23.18 % TOPCon
The verdict

One difference, none of them an advantage

The largest is dimensions: 2384x1303x35 mm vs 2384x1303x30 mm. 16 of 17 comparable parameters are identical, with 2 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish them.

See the one difference
How alike are they
16 of 17 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

1 of 17 parameters
Parameter M-715 M TOPCON-720 Difference
Dimensions 2384x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x30 mm 2384x1303x35 mm vs 2384x1303x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Declared annual degradation, with a 1.0% first-year loss assumed for both panels because at least one datasheet omits it, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
M-715
23,616 kWh
M TOPCON-720
23,782 kWh
Lifetime gap
166 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario M-715 M TOPCON-720
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 715 W 720 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 683 W 688 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 651 W 655 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 618 W 623 W
03

Full specification

Parameter M-715 M TOPCON-720 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 715 Wp 720 Wp Effectively the same
Module efficiency 23.02 % 23.18 % Effectively the same
Power density 230.2 Wp/m² 231.8 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 49.20 V 49.40 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 41.10 V 41.30 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 18.44 A 18.49 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 17.40 A 17.44 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.300 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x30 mm 2384x1303x35 mm vs 2384x1303x30 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight - 32.3 kg Not published by Resun Solar
Weight per kWp - 44.9 kg/kWp Not published by Resun Solar
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.50 %/yr 0.50 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial No No Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#1,797 vs #1,424
M TOPCON-720 leads by 373 places
Power density
#2,018 vs #1,347
M TOPCON-720 leads by 671 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093 vs #6,093
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#13,988 vs #559
M TOPCON-720 leads by 13,429 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#670 vs #325
M TOPCON-720 leads by 345 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Resun Solar
Resun Solar RS9H-M-715 vs Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-735
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Resun Solar
Resun Solar RS9H-M-715 vs Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-730
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Resun Solar
Resun Solar RS9H-M-715 vs Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-725
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Resun Solar
Resun Solar RS9H-M-715 vs Resun Solar RS9H-M-720
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Resun Solar
Resun Solar RS9H-M-715 vs Resun Solar RS9H-M-DG-720
One difference: bifacial
Same series, other bin
Resun Solar
Resun Solar RS9H-M-715 vs Resun Solar RS9H-M-DG-715
One difference: bifacial
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Resun Solar RS9H-M-715 or Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-720?
According to our database: Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-720 has higher module efficiency (23.18% vs 23.02%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Resun Solar RS9H-M-715 and Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-720?
Resun Solar RS9H-M-715 has a module efficiency of 23.02%, while Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-720 is 23.18%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Resun Solar RS9H-M-715 use vs Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-720?
Resun Solar RS9H-M-715 uses TOPCon cells; Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-720 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Resun Solar RS9H-M-715 and Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-720?
Resun Solar RS9H-M-715 has a 30 years power warranty; Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-720 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.