Skip to main content
RS8V435M-FB vs RS9H-M TOPCON-735 6 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Resun Solar RS8V435M-FB vs Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-735

Resun Solar
RS8V435M-FB
435 Wp 22.28 % TOPCon
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-735
Resun Solar
RS9H-M TOPCON-735
735 Wp 23.66 % TOPCon
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

RS9H-M TOPCON-735 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.38 pp more efficient. 6 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 13 differences
How alike are they
6 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

13 of 19 parameters
Parameter RS8V435M-FB RS9H-M TOPCON-735 Difference
Module efficiency 22.28 % 23.66 % 1.38 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient -0.350 %/°C -0.300 %/°C 0.050 %/°C better in heat
Rated power 435 Wp 735 Wp 300 W more power
Power density 222.8 Wp/m² 236.6 Wp/m² 13.8 Wp/m² higher
Weight 21.5 kg 32.3 kg 10.8 kg lighter
Weight per kWp 49.4 kg/kWp 43.9 kg/kWp 5.5 kg/kWp lighter
Open-circuit voltage 37.97 V 50.00 V 12.03 V apart
Short-circuit current 14.35 A 18.64 A 4.29 A apart
Module area 1.953 m² 3.106 m² 1.154 m² apart
Voltage at max power 32.25 V 41.90 V 9.65 V apart
Current at max power 13.49 A 17.55 A 4.06 A apart
Cell count 108 132 24 cells apart
Dimensions 1722x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x30 mm 1722x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Declared annual degradation, with a 1.0% first-year loss assumed for both panels because at least one datasheet omits it, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
RS8V435M-FB
14,368 kWh
RS9H-M TOPCON-735
24,277 kWh
Lifetime gap
9,909 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario RS8V435M-FB RS9H-M TOPCON-735
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 435 W 735 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.8% of rated power 412 W 702 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 89.5% of rated power 389 W 669 W
Hot roof 70 °C 84.2% of rated power 366 W 636 W
03

Full specification

Parameter RS8V435M-FB RS9H-M TOPCON-735 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 435 Wp 735 Wp +300 W for RS9H-M TOPCON-735
Module efficiency 22.28 % 23.66 % +1.38 pp for RS9H-M TOPCON-735
Power density 222.8 Wp/m² 236.6 Wp/m² +13.8 Wp/m² for RS9H-M TOPCON-735
Open-circuit voltage 37.97 V 50.00 V 12.03 V apart
Voltage at max power 32.25 V 41.90 V 9.65 V apart
Short-circuit current 14.35 A 18.64 A 4.29 A apart
Current at max power 13.49 A 17.55 A 4.06 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.350 %/°C -0.300 %/°C +0.050 %/°C for RS9H-M TOPCON-735
Mechanical
Dimensions 1722x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x30 mm 1722x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x30 mm
Module area 1.953 m² 3.106 m² 1.154 m² apart
Weight 21.5 kg 32.3 kg -10.8 kg for RS8V435M-FB
Weight per kWp 49.4 kg/kWp 43.9 kg/kWp -5.5 kg/kWp for RS9H-M TOPCON-735
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.50 %/yr 0.50 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 132 24 cells apart
Bifacial No No Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#5,403 vs #602
RS9H-M TOPCON-735 leads by 4,801 places
Power density
#5,150 vs #582
RS9H-M TOPCON-735 leads by 4,568 places
Heat behaviour
#10,419 vs #6,093
RS9H-M TOPCON-735 leads by 4,326 places
Weight
#2,936 vs #364
RS9H-M TOPCON-735 leads by 2,572 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#9,138 vs #149
RS9H-M TOPCON-735 leads by 8,989 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Resun Solar
Resun Solar RS8V435M-FB vs Resun Solar RS8V430M-FB
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Resun Solar
Resun Solar RS8V435M-FB vs Resun Solar RS8V425M-FB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Resun Solar
Resun Solar RS8V435M-FB vs Resun Solar RS8V420M-FB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Resun Solar
Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-735 vs Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-730
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Resun Solar
Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-735 vs Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-725
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Resun Solar
Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-735 vs Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-720
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Resun Solar RS8V435M-FB or Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-735?
According to our database: Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-735 has higher module efficiency (23.66% vs 22.28%); Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-735 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.300%/°C vs -0.350%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Resun Solar RS8V435M-FB and Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-735?
Resun Solar RS8V435M-FB has a module efficiency of 22.28%, while Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-735 is 23.66%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Resun Solar RS8V435M-FB use vs Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-735?
Resun Solar RS8V435M-FB uses TOPCon cells; Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-735 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Resun Solar RS8V435M-FB and Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-735?
Resun Solar RS8V435M-FB has a 30 years power warranty; Resun Solar RS9H-M TOPCON-735 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.