Skip to main content
595 vs 610 15 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

Renewsys DESERV Extreme 144X-595 vs Renewsys DESERV Extreme 144X-610

Renewsys
DESERV Extreme 144X-595
595 Wp 23.06 % TOPCon Bifacial Incomplete
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Renewsys
DESERV Extreme 144X-610
610 Wp 23.64 % TOPCon Bifacial Incomplete
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

610 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.58 pp more efficient. 15 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
15 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

3 of 18 parameters
Parameter 595 610 Difference
Module efficiency 23.06 % 23.64 % 0.58 pp more efficient
Power density 230.6 Wp/m² 236.4 Wp/m² 5.8 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 595 Wp 610 Wp 15 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.292 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
595
19,963 kWh
610
20,467 kWh
Lifetime gap
504 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 595 610
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 595 W 610 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.6% of rated power 569 W 583 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.2% of rated power 543 W 557 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.9% of rated power 517 W 530 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 595 610 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 595 Wp 610 Wp +15 W for 610
Module efficiency 23.06 % 23.64 % +0.58 pp for 610
Power density 230.6 Wp/m² 236.4 Wp/m² +5.8 Wp/m² for 610
Open-circuit voltage 52.73 V 53.58 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 44.15 V 44.85 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 14.38 A 14.51 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.49 A 13.61 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.292 %/°C -0.292 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2277x1133x35 mm 2277x1133x35 mm Same
Module area 2.580 m² 2.580 m² Same
Weight 31.5 kg 31.5 kg Same
Weight per kWp 52.9 kg/kWp 51.6 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 144 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#1,698 vs #614
610 leads by 1,084 places
Power density
#1,684 vs #613
610 leads by 1,071 places
Heat behaviour
#6,056 vs #6,056
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#6,657 vs #5,004
610 leads by 1,653 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#3,286 vs #2,188
610 leads by 1,098 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Renewsys
Renewsys DESERV Extreme 144X-595 vs Renewsys DESERV Extreme 144X-605
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Renewsys
Renewsys DESERV Extreme 144X-595 vs Renewsys DESERV Extreme 144X-600
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Renewsys
Renewsys DESERV Extreme 144X-595 vs Renewsys DESERV Extreme 144X-590
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Renewsys
Renewsys DESERV Extreme 144X-595 vs Renewsys DESERV Extreme 144X-585
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Renewsys
Renewsys DESERV Extreme 144X-595 vs Renewsys DESERV Extreme 144X-580
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Renewsys
Renewsys DESERV Extreme 144X-595 vs Renewsys DESERV Extreme 144X-575
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Renewsys DESERV Extreme 144X-595 or Renewsys DESERV Extreme 144X-610?
According to our database: Renewsys DESERV Extreme 144X-610 has higher module efficiency (23.64% vs 23.06%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Renewsys DESERV Extreme 144X-595 and Renewsys DESERV Extreme 144X-610?
Renewsys DESERV Extreme 144X-595 has a module efficiency of 23.06%, while Renewsys DESERV Extreme 144X-610 is 23.64%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Renewsys DESERV Extreme 144X-595 use vs Renewsys DESERV Extreme 144X-610?
Renewsys DESERV Extreme 144X-595 uses TOPCon cells; Renewsys DESERV Extreme 144X-610 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Renewsys DESERV Extreme 144X-595 and Renewsys DESERV Extreme 144X-610?
Renewsys DESERV Extreme 144X-595 has a 30 years power warranty; Renewsys DESERV Extreme 144X-610 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Renewsys DESERV Extreme 144X-595 and Renewsys DESERV Extreme 144X-610 bifacial panels?
Both Renewsys DESERV Extreme 144X-595 and Renewsys DESERV Extreme 144X-610 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 3 Renewsys offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.