Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD560 vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575
VS
The verdict
RPS2MH72BD575 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.58 pp more efficient. 9 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 10 differencesHow alike are they
9
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
10 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
RPS2MH72BD560
RPS2MH72BD575
Difference
Module efficiency
21.68 %
22.26 %
0.58 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient
-0.320 %/°C
-0.300 %/°C
0.020 %/°C better in heat
Power density
216.8 Wp/m²
222.6 Wp/m²
5.8 Wp/m² higher
Open-circuit voltage
49.84 V
52.90 V
3.06 V apart
Rated power
560 Wp
575 Wp
15 W more power
Cell technology
PERC
TOPCon
PERC vs TOPCon
Annual degradation
0.45 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
0.05 %/yr slower
Voltage at max power
41.15 V
44.61 V
3.46 V apart
Short-circuit current
14.22 A
13.58 A
0.64 A apart
Current at max power
13.61 A
12.89 A
0.72 A apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
RPS2MH72BD560
18,441 kWh
RPS2MH72BD575
19,292 kWh
Lifetime gap
851 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
RPS2MH72BD560
RPS2MH72BD575
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
560 W
575 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.2% of rated power
533 W
549 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
90.4% of rated power
506 W
523 W
Hot roof
70 °C
85.6% of rated power
479 W
497 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
RPS2MH72BD560
RPS2MH72BD575
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
560 Wp
575 Wp
+15 W for RPS2MH72BD575
Module efficiency
21.68 %
22.26 %
+0.58 pp for RPS2MH72BD575
Power density
216.8 Wp/m²
222.6 Wp/m²
+5.8 Wp/m² for RPS2MH72BD575
Open-circuit voltage
49.84 V
52.90 V
3.06 V apart
Voltage at max power
41.15 V
44.61 V
3.46 V apart
Short-circuit current
14.22 A
13.58 A
0.64 A apart
Current at max power
13.61 A
12.89 A
0.72 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.320 %/°C
-0.300 %/°C
+0.020 %/°C for RPS2MH72BD575
Mechanical
Dimensions
2278x1134x30 mm
2278x1134x30 mm
Same
Module area
2.583 m²
2.583 m²
Same
Weight
32.5 kg
32.5 kg
Same
Weight per kWp
58.0 kg/kWp
56.5 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.45 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
-0.05 %/yr for RPS2MH72BD575
Technology
Cell technology
PERC
TOPCon
PERC vs TOPCon
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
144
144
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#7,606
vs
#5,656
RPS2MH72BD575 leads by 1,950 places
Power density
#7,516
vs
#5,612
RPS2MH72BD575 leads by 1,904 places
Heat behaviour
#8,376
vs
#6,152
RPS2MH72BD575 leads by 2,224 places
Weight
#11,622
vs
#10,781
RPS2MH72BD575 leads by 841 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#6,185
vs
#5,025
RPS2MH72BD575 leads by 1,160 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Renew Photovoltaics
Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD560 vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD555
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Renew Photovoltaics
Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD560 vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD550
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Renew Photovoltaics
Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD560 vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD545
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Renew Photovoltaics
Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD560 vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD540
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Renew Photovoltaics
Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD560 vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD535
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Renew Photovoltaics
Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD560 vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD530
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD560 or Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575?
According to our database: Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575 has higher module efficiency (22.26% vs 21.68%); Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.300%/°C vs -0.320%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD560 and Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575?
Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD560 has a module efficiency of 21.68%, while Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575 is 22.26%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD560 use vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575?
Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD560 uses PERC cells; Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD560 and Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575?
Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD560 has a 30 years power warranty; Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD560 and Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575 bifacial panels?
Both Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD560 and Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.