Renesola RS7-625N-E2 vs Renesola RS9-715NBG-E1
VS
The verdict
RS9-715NBG-E1 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.66 pp more efficient. 6 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 13 differencesHow alike are they
6
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
13 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
RS7-625N-E2
RS9-715NBG-E1
Difference
Module efficiency
22.36 %
23.02 %
0.66 pp more efficient
Rated power
625 Wp
715 Wp
90 W more power
Weight
30.0 kg
38.7 kg
8.7 kg lighter
Weight per kWp
48.0 kg/kWp
54.1 kg/kWp
6.1 kg/kWp lighter
Power density
223.6 Wp/m²
230.2 Wp/m²
6.6 Wp/m² higher
Open-circuit voltage
56.95 V
49.20 V
7.75 V apart
Short-circuit current
13.92 A
18.44 A
4.52 A apart
Module area
2.795 m²
3.106 m²
0.311 m² apart
Voltage at max power
47.14 V
41.10 V
6.04 V apart
Current at max power
13.26 A
17.40 A
4.14 A apart
Cell count
156
132
24 cells apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
Dimensions
2465x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
2465x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
RS7-625N-E2
20,970 kWh
RS9-715NBG-E1
23,990 kWh
Lifetime gap
3,020 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
RS7-625N-E2
RS9-715NBG-E1
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
625 W
715 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
598 W
684 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
571 W
653 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
543 W
622 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
RS7-625N-E2
RS9-715NBG-E1
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
625 Wp
715 Wp
+90 W for RS9-715NBG-E1
Module efficiency
22.36 %
23.02 %
+0.66 pp for RS9-715NBG-E1
Power density
223.6 Wp/m²
230.2 Wp/m²
+6.6 Wp/m² for RS9-715NBG-E1
Open-circuit voltage
56.95 V
49.20 V
7.75 V apart
Voltage at max power
47.14 V
41.10 V
6.04 V apart
Short-circuit current
13.92 A
18.44 A
4.52 A apart
Current at max power
13.26 A
17.40 A
4.14 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2465x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
2465x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area
2.795 m²
3.106 m²
0.311 m² apart
Weight
30.0 kg
38.7 kg
-8.7 kg for RS7-625N-E2
Weight per kWp
48.0 kg/kWp
54.1 kg/kWp
-6.1 kg/kWp for RS7-625N-E2
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
15 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
N-type
N-type
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
156
132
24 cells apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#5,007
vs
#1,797
RS9-715NBG-E1 leads by 3,210 places
Power density
#4,955
vs
#2,018
RS9-715NBG-E1 leads by 2,937 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165
vs
#2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#2,004
vs
#8,339
RS7-625N-E2 leads by 6,335 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#2,440
vs
#471
RS9-715NBG-E1 leads by 1,969 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Renesola
Renesola RS7-625N-E2 vs Renesola RS7-635N-E2
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Renesola
Renesola RS7-625N-E2 vs Renesola RS7-630N-E2
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Renesola
Renesola RS7-625N-E2 vs Renesola RS7-620N-E2
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Renesola
Renesola RS7-625N-E2 vs Renesola RS7-615N-E2
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Renesola
Renesola RS9-715NBG-E1 vs Renesola RS9-720NBG-E1
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Renesola
Renesola RS9-715NBG-E1 vs Renesola RS9-710NBG-E1
The same specification on paper
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Renesola RS7-625N-E2 or Renesola RS9-715NBG-E1?
According to our database: Renesola RS9-715NBG-E1 has higher module efficiency (23.02% vs 22.36%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Renesola RS7-625N-E2 and Renesola RS9-715NBG-E1?
Renesola RS7-625N-E2 has a module efficiency of 22.36%, while Renesola RS9-715NBG-E1 is 23.02%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Renesola RS7-625N-E2 use vs Renesola RS9-715NBG-E1?
Renesola RS7-625N-E2 uses N-type cells; Renesola RS9-715NBG-E1 uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Renesola RS7-625N-E2 and Renesola RS9-715NBG-E1?
Renesola RS7-625N-E2 has a 30 years power warranty; Renesola RS9-715NBG-E1 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Renesola RS7-625N-E2 and Renesola RS9-715NBG-E1 bifacial panels?
Renesola RS9-715NBG-E1 is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Renesola RS7-625N-E2 is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 1 Renesola offer
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.
