Skip to main content
RS7-625N-E2 vs RS9-710NBG-E1 6 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Renesola RS7-625N-E2 vs Renesola RS9-710NBG-E1

Renesola RS7-625N-E2
Renesola
RS7-625N-E2
625 Wp 22.36 % N-type
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Renesola
RS9-710NBG-E1
710 Wp 22.86 % N-type Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

RS9-710NBG-E1 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is rated power: 85 W more power. 6 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 13 differences
How alike are they
6 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

13 of 19 parameters
Parameter RS7-625N-E2 RS9-710NBG-E1 Difference
Rated power 625 Wp 710 Wp 85 W more power
Module efficiency 22.36 % 22.86 % 0.50 pp more efficient
Weight 30.0 kg 38.7 kg 8.7 kg lighter
Weight per kWp 48.0 kg/kWp 54.5 kg/kWp 6.5 kg/kWp lighter
Open-circuit voltage 56.95 V 49.00 V 7.95 V apart
Short-circuit current 13.92 A 18.40 A 4.48 A apart
Module area 2.795 m² 3.106 m² 0.311 m² apart
Power density 223.6 Wp/m² 228.6 Wp/m² 5.0 Wp/m² higher
Voltage at max power 47.14 V 40.90 V 6.24 V apart
Current at max power 13.26 A 17.36 A 4.10 A apart
Cell count 156 132 24 cells apart
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
Dimensions 2465x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2465x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
RS7-625N-E2
20,970 kWh
RS9-710NBG-E1
23,822 kWh
Lifetime gap
2,852 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario RS7-625N-E2 RS9-710NBG-E1
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 625 W 710 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 598 W 679 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 571 W 648 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 543 W 617 W
03

Full specification

Parameter RS7-625N-E2 RS9-710NBG-E1 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 625 Wp 710 Wp +85 W for RS9-710NBG-E1
Module efficiency 22.36 % 22.86 % +0.50 pp for RS9-710NBG-E1
Power density 223.6 Wp/m² 228.6 Wp/m² +5.0 Wp/m² for RS9-710NBG-E1
Open-circuit voltage 56.95 V 49.00 V 7.95 V apart
Voltage at max power 47.14 V 40.90 V 6.24 V apart
Short-circuit current 13.92 A 18.40 A 4.48 A apart
Current at max power 13.26 A 17.36 A 4.10 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2465x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2465x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area 2.795 m² 3.106 m² 0.311 m² apart
Weight 30.0 kg 38.7 kg -8.7 kg for RS7-625N-E2
Weight per kWp 48.0 kg/kWp 54.5 kg/kWp -6.5 kg/kWp for RS7-625N-E2
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology N-type N-type Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 156 132 24 cells apart
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#5,007 vs #2,536
RS9-710NBG-E1 leads by 2,471 places
Power density
#4,955 vs #2,474
RS9-710NBG-E1 leads by 2,481 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#2,004 vs #8,842
RS7-625N-E2 leads by 6,838 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#2,440 vs #618
RS9-710NBG-E1 leads by 1,822 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Renesola
Renesola RS7-625N-E2 vs Renesola RS7-635N-E2
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Renesola
Renesola RS7-625N-E2 vs Renesola RS7-630N-E2
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Renesola
Renesola RS7-625N-E2 vs Renesola RS7-620N-E2
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Renesola
Renesola RS7-625N-E2 vs Renesola RS7-615N-E2
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Renesola
Renesola RS9-710NBG-E1 vs Renesola RS9-720NBG-E1
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Renesola
Renesola RS9-710NBG-E1 vs Renesola RS9-715NBG-E1
The same specification on paper
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Renesola RS7-625N-E2 or Renesola RS9-710NBG-E1?
According to our database: Renesola RS9-710NBG-E1 has higher module efficiency (22.86% vs 22.36%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Renesola RS7-625N-E2 and Renesola RS9-710NBG-E1?
Renesola RS7-625N-E2 has a module efficiency of 22.36%, while Renesola RS9-710NBG-E1 is 22.86%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Renesola RS7-625N-E2 use vs Renesola RS9-710NBG-E1?
Renesola RS7-625N-E2 uses N-type cells; Renesola RS9-710NBG-E1 uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Renesola RS7-625N-E2 and Renesola RS9-710NBG-E1?
Renesola RS7-625N-E2 has a 30 years power warranty; Renesola RS9-710NBG-E1 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Renesola RS7-625N-E2 and Renesola RS9-710NBG-E1 bifacial panels?
Renesola RS9-710NBG-E1 is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Renesola RS7-625N-E2 is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 1 Renesola offer

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.