Recom RCM-715-8NM vs Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series)
VS
The verdict
12 differences, and they point both ways
The largest is rated power: 250 W more power. 6 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 12 differencesHow alike are they
6
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
12 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
715-8NM
465-RDBNAA (Lynx series)
Difference
Rated power
715 Wp
465 Wp
250 W more power
Weight
33.9 kg
25.0 kg
8.9 kg lighter
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.280 %/°C
0.020 %/°C better in heat
Weight per kWp
47.4 kg/kWp
53.8 kg/kWp
6.4 kg/kWp lighter
Open-circuit voltage
48.90 V
36.10 V
12.80 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.39 A
16.24 A
2.15 A apart
Module area
3.106 m²
1.998 m²
1.108 m² apart
Module efficiency
23.02 %
23.27 %
0.25 pp more efficient
Voltage at max power
41.10 V
30.40 V
10.70 V apart
Current at max power
17.40 A
15.30 A
2.10 A apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
Dimensions
2384x1303x30 mm
1762x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x30 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
715-8NM
23,990 kWh
465-RDBNAA (Lynx series)
15,602 kWh
Lifetime gap
8,388 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
715-8NM
465-RDBNAA (Lynx series)
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
715 W
465 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.5% of rated power
683 W
445 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.0% of rated power
651 W
426 W
Hot roof
70 °C
86.5% of rated power
618 W
406 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
715-8NM
465-RDBNAA (Lynx series)
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
715 Wp
465 Wp
+250 W for 715-8NM
Module efficiency
23.02 %
23.27 %
+0.25 pp for 465-RDBNAA (Lynx series)
Power density
230.2 Wp/m²
232.7 Wp/m²
Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage
48.90 V
36.10 V
12.80 V apart
Voltage at max power
41.10 V
30.40 V
10.70 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.39 A
16.24 A
2.15 A apart
Current at max power
17.40 A
15.30 A
2.10 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.280 %/°C
+0.020 %/°C for 465-RDBNAA (Lynx series)
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x30 mm
1762x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x30 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm
Module area
3.106 m²
1.998 m²
1.108 m² apart
Weight
33.9 kg
25.0 kg
-8.9 kg for 465-RDBNAA (Lynx series)
Weight per kWp
47.4 kg/kWp
53.8 kg/kWp
-6.4 kg/kWp for 715-8NM
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
-
192
Not published by Recom
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#1,797
vs
#1,202
465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) leads by 595 places
Power density
#2,018
vs
#1,115
465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) leads by 903 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093
vs
#1,309
465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) leads by 4,784 places
Weight
#1,670
vs
#7,824
715-8NM leads by 6,154 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#37
vs
#3,845
715-8NM leads by 3,808 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Recom
Recom RCM-715-8NM vs Recom RCM-730-8DBNM
8 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Recom
Recom RCM-715-8NM vs Recom RCM-725-8DBNM
8 differences, the largest is weight
Same series, other bin
Recom
Recom RCM-715-8NM vs Recom RCM-720-8DBNM
5 differences, the largest is weight
Same series, other bin
Recom
Recom RCM-715-8NM vs Recom RCM-715-8DBNM
5 differences, the largest is weight
Same series, other bin
Recom
Recom RCM-715-8NM vs Recom RCM-710-8DBNM
5 differences, the largest is weight
Same series, other bin
Recom
Recom RCM-715-8NM vs Recom RCM-710-8NM
The same specification on paper
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Recom RCM-715-8NM or Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series)?
According to our database: Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) has higher module efficiency (23.27% vs 23.02%); Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.280%/°C vs -0.300%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Recom RCM-715-8NM and Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series)?
Recom RCM-715-8NM has a module efficiency of 23.02%, while Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) is 23.27%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Recom RCM-715-8NM use vs Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series)?
Recom RCM-715-8NM uses TOPCon cells; Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Recom RCM-715-8NM and Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series)?
Recom RCM-715-8NM has a 30 years power warranty; Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Recom RCM-715-8NM and Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) bifacial panels?
Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Recom RCM-715-8NM is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 3 Recom offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.