Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) vs Recom RCM-725-8DBNM
VS
The verdict
10 differences, and they point both ways
The largest is rated power: 260 W more power. 9 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 10 differencesHow alike are they
9
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
10 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
465-RDBNAA (Lynx series)
725-8DBNM
Difference
Rated power
465 Wp
725 Wp
260 W more power
Weight
25.0 kg
37.8 kg
12.8 kg lighter
Open-circuit voltage
36.10 V
49.41 V
13.31 V apart
Short-circuit current
16.24 A
18.64 A
2.40 A apart
Module area
1.998 m²
3.106 m²
1.108 m² apart
Temperature coefficient
-0.280 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
0.010 %/°C better in heat
Voltage at max power
30.40 V
41.27 V
10.87 V apart
Current at max power
15.30 A
17.57 A
2.27 A apart
Cell count
192
132
60 cells apart
Dimensions
1762x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
1762x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
465-RDBNAA (Lynx series)
15,602 kWh
725-8DBNM
24,325 kWh
Lifetime gap
8,723 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
465-RDBNAA (Lynx series)
725-8DBNM
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
465 W
725 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
445 W
693 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
426 W
662 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
406 W
630 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
465-RDBNAA (Lynx series)
725-8DBNM
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
465 Wp
725 Wp
+260 W for 725-8DBNM
Module efficiency
23.27 %
23.30 %
Effectively the same
Power density
232.7 Wp/m²
233.4 Wp/m²
Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage
36.10 V
49.41 V
13.31 V apart
Voltage at max power
30.40 V
41.27 V
10.87 V apart
Short-circuit current
16.24 A
18.64 A
2.40 A apart
Current at max power
15.30 A
17.57 A
2.27 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.280 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
+0.010 %/°C for 465-RDBNAA (Lynx series)
Mechanical
Dimensions
1762x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
1762x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area
1.998 m²
3.106 m²
1.108 m² apart
Weight
25.0 kg
37.8 kg
-12.8 kg for 465-RDBNAA (Lynx series)
Weight per kWp
53.8 kg/kWp
52.1 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
192
132
60 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#1,202
vs
#1,017
725-8DBNM leads by 185 places
Power density
#1,115
vs
#936
725-8DBNM leads by 179 places
Heat behaviour
#1,309
vs
#2,165
465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) leads by 856 places
Weight
#7,824
vs
#5,609
725-8DBNM leads by 2,215 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#3,845
vs
#14
725-8DBNM leads by 3,831 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Recom
Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) vs Recom RCM-730-8DBNM
11 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Recom
Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) vs Recom RCM-720-8DBNM
10 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Recom
Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) vs Recom RCM-715-8DBNM
11 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Recom
Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) vs Recom RCM-715-8NM
12 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Recom
Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) vs Recom RCM-710-8DBNM
12 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Recom
Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) vs Recom RCM-710-8NM
13 differences, the largest is rated power
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) or Recom RCM-725-8DBNM?
According to our database: Recom RCM-725-8DBNM has higher module efficiency (23.30% vs 23.27%); Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.280%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) and Recom RCM-725-8DBNM?
Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) has a module efficiency of 23.27%, while Recom RCM-725-8DBNM is 23.30%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) use vs Recom RCM-725-8DBNM?
Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) uses TOPCon cells; Recom RCM-725-8DBNM uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) and Recom RCM-725-8DBNM?
Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) has a 30 years power warranty; Recom RCM-725-8DBNM has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) and Recom RCM-725-8DBNM bifacial panels?
Both Recom RCM-465-RDBNAA (Lynx series) and Recom RCM-725-8DBNM are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 3 Recom offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.