Recom RCM-445-RDBNAA (Lynx series) vs Recom RCM-710-8NM
VS
The verdict
710-8NM leads on the differences that matter
The largest is rated power: 265 W more power. 5 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 13 differencesHow alike are they
5
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
13 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
445-RDBNAA (Lynx series)
710-8NM
Difference
Rated power
445 Wp
710 Wp
265 W more power
Module efficiency
22.27 %
22.86 %
0.59 pp more efficient
Weight
25.0 kg
33.9 kg
8.9 kg lighter
Weight per kWp
56.2 kg/kWp
47.7 kg/kWp
8.4 kg/kWp lighter
Temperature coefficient
-0.280 %/°C
-0.300 %/°C
0.020 %/°C better in heat
Open-circuit voltage
35.30 V
48.70 V
13.40 V apart
Short-circuit current
15.96 A
18.35 A
2.39 A apart
Module area
1.998 m²
3.106 m²
1.108 m² apart
Power density
222.7 Wp/m²
228.6 Wp/m²
5.9 Wp/m² higher
Voltage at max power
29.60 V
40.90 V
11.30 V apart
Current at max power
15.04 A
17.37 A
2.33 A apart
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
Dimensions
1762x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x30 mm
1762x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
445-RDBNAA (Lynx series)
14,931 kWh
710-8NM
23,822 kWh
Lifetime gap
8,891 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
445-RDBNAA (Lynx series)
710-8NM
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
445 W
710 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.5% of rated power
426 W
678 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.0% of rated power
408 W
646 W
Hot roof
70 °C
86.5% of rated power
389 W
614 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
445-RDBNAA (Lynx series)
710-8NM
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
445 Wp
710 Wp
+265 W for 710-8NM
Module efficiency
22.27 %
22.86 %
+0.59 pp for 710-8NM
Power density
222.7 Wp/m²
228.6 Wp/m²
+5.9 Wp/m² for 710-8NM
Open-circuit voltage
35.30 V
48.70 V
13.40 V apart
Voltage at max power
29.60 V
40.90 V
11.30 V apart
Short-circuit current
15.96 A
18.35 A
2.39 A apart
Current at max power
15.04 A
17.37 A
2.33 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.280 %/°C
-0.300 %/°C
+0.020 %/°C for 445-RDBNAA (Lynx series)
Mechanical
Dimensions
1762x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x30 mm
1762x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x30 mm
Module area
1.998 m²
3.106 m²
1.108 m² apart
Weight
25.0 kg
33.9 kg
-8.9 kg for 445-RDBNAA (Lynx series)
Weight per kWp
56.2 kg/kWp
47.7 kg/kWp
-8.4 kg/kWp for 710-8NM
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
192
-
Not published by Recom
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#5,481
vs
#2,536
710-8NM leads by 2,945 places
Power density
#5,302
vs
#2,474
710-8NM leads by 2,828 places
Heat behaviour
#1,309
vs
#6,093
445-RDBNAA (Lynx series) leads by 4,784 places
Weight
#10,457
vs
#1,881
710-8NM leads by 8,576 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#5,619
vs
#54
710-8NM leads by 5,565 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Recom
Recom RCM-445-RDBNAA (Lynx series) vs Recom RCM-730-8DBNM
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Recom
Recom RCM-445-RDBNAA (Lynx series) vs Recom RCM-725-8DBNM
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Recom
Recom RCM-445-RDBNAA (Lynx series) vs Recom RCM-720-8DBNM
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Recom
Recom RCM-445-RDBNAA (Lynx series) vs Recom RCM-715-8DBNM
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Recom
Recom RCM-445-RDBNAA (Lynx series) vs Recom RCM-715-8NM
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Recom
Recom RCM-445-RDBNAA (Lynx series) vs Recom RCM-710-8DBNM
13 differences, the largest is rated power
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Recom RCM-445-RDBNAA (Lynx series) or Recom RCM-710-8NM?
According to our database: Recom RCM-710-8NM has higher module efficiency (22.86% vs 22.27%); Recom RCM-445-RDBNAA (Lynx series) tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.280%/°C vs -0.300%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Recom RCM-445-RDBNAA (Lynx series) and Recom RCM-710-8NM?
Recom RCM-445-RDBNAA (Lynx series) has a module efficiency of 22.27%, while Recom RCM-710-8NM is 22.86%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Recom RCM-445-RDBNAA (Lynx series) use vs Recom RCM-710-8NM?
Recom RCM-445-RDBNAA (Lynx series) uses TOPCon cells; Recom RCM-710-8NM uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Recom RCM-445-RDBNAA (Lynx series) and Recom RCM-710-8NM?
Recom RCM-445-RDBNAA (Lynx series) has a 30 years power warranty; Recom RCM-710-8NM has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Recom RCM-445-RDBNAA (Lynx series) and Recom RCM-710-8NM bifacial panels?
Recom RCM-445-RDBNAA (Lynx series) is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Recom RCM-710-8NM is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 3 Recom offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.