Skip to main content
REC640AA PRO M vs REC630AA Pro MG 12 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

REC REC640AA PRO M vs REC REC630AA Pro MG

REC REC640AA PRO M
REC
REC640AA PRO M
640 Wp 22.50 % HJT Bifacial
VS
REC REC630AA Pro MG
REC
REC630AA Pro MG
630 Wp 22.20 % HJT Bifacial
The verdict

7 differences, and they point both ways

The largest is performance warranty: 5 yrs longer. 12 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 7 differences
How alike are they
12 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

7 of 19 parameters
Parameter REC640AA PRO M REC630AA Pro MG Difference
Performance warranty 25 yrs 30 yrs 5 yrs longer
Weight 32.5 kg 36.8 kg 4.3 kg lighter
Product warranty 20 yrs 30 yrs 10 yrs longer
Weight per kWp 50.8 kg/kWp 58.4 kg/kWp 7.6 kg/kWp lighter
Module efficiency 22.50 % 22.20 % 0.30 pp more efficient
Power density 225.5 Wp/m² 222.0 Wp/m² 3.5 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 640 Wp 630 Wp 10 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.240 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
REC640AA PRO M
21,744 kWh
REC630AA Pro MG
21,404 kWh
Lifetime gap
340 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario REC640AA PRO M REC630AA Pro MG
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 640 W 630 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 96.4% of rated power 617 W 607 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 92.8% of rated power 594 W 585 W
Hot roof 70 °C 89.2% of rated power 571 W 562 W
03

Full specification

Parameter REC640AA PRO M REC630AA Pro MG Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 640 Wp 630 Wp +10 W for REC640AA PRO M
Module efficiency 22.50 % 22.20 % +0.30 pp for REC640AA PRO M
Power density 225.5 Wp/m² 222.0 Wp/m² +3.5 Wp/m² for REC640AA PRO M
Open-circuit voltage 44.60 V 44.70 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 37.10 V 36.80 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 17.93 A 17.78 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 17.26 A 17.12 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.240 %/°C -0.240 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2175x1305x30 mm 2175x1305x30 mm Same
Module area 2.838 m² 2.838 m² Same
Weight 32.5 kg 36.8 kg -4.3 kg for REC640AA PRO M
Weight per kWp 50.8 kg/kWp 58.4 kg/kWp -7.6 kg/kWp for REC640AA PRO M
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 20 yrs 30 yrs +10 yrs for REC630AA Pro MG
Performance warranty 25 yrs 30 yrs +5 yrs for REC630AA Pro MG
Annual degradation 0.25 %/yr 0.25 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology HJT HJT Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 120 120 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#4,222 vs #5,817
REC640AA PRO M leads by 1,595 places
Power density
#3,889 vs #5,856
REC640AA PRO M leads by 1,967 places
Heat behaviour
#13 vs #13
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#4,196 vs #11,722
REC640AA PRO M leads by 7,526 places
Warranty
#9,798 vs #21
REC630AA Pro MG leads by 9,777 places
Overall
#1,949 vs #796
REC630AA Pro MG leads by 1,153 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
REC
REC REC640AA PRO M vs REC REC630AA PRO M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
REC
REC REC640AA PRO M vs REC REC620AA PRO M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
REC
REC REC640AA PRO M vs REC REC610AA PRO M
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
REC
REC REC640AA PRO M vs REC REC600AA PRO M
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
REC
REC REC630AA Pro MG vs REC REC640AA Pro MG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
REC
REC REC630AA Pro MG vs REC REC620AA Pro MG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: REC REC640AA PRO M or REC REC630AA Pro MG?
According to our database: REC REC640AA PRO M has higher module efficiency (22.50% vs 22.20%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of REC REC640AA PRO M and REC REC630AA Pro MG?
REC REC640AA PRO M has a module efficiency of 22.50%, while REC REC630AA Pro MG is 22.20%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does REC REC640AA PRO M use vs REC REC630AA Pro MG?
REC REC640AA PRO M uses HJT cells; REC REC630AA Pro MG uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on REC REC640AA PRO M and REC REC630AA Pro MG?
REC REC640AA PRO M has a 25 years power warranty; REC REC630AA Pro MG has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are REC REC640AA PRO M and REC REC630AA Pro MG bifacial panels?
Both REC REC640AA PRO M and REC REC630AA Pro MG are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 7 REC offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.