Skip to main content
REC610AA PRO M vs REC640AA Pro MG 12 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

REC REC610AA PRO M vs REC REC640AA Pro MG

REC REC610AA PRO M
REC
REC610AA PRO M
610 Wp 21.50 % HJT Bifacial
VS
REC REC640AA Pro MG
REC
REC640AA Pro MG
640 Wp 22.50 % HJT Bifacial
The verdict

REC640AA Pro MG leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.00 pp more efficient. 12 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 7 differences
How alike are they
12 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

7 of 19 parameters
Parameter REC610AA PRO M REC640AA Pro MG Difference
Module efficiency 21.50 % 22.50 % 1.00 pp more efficient
Performance warranty 25 yrs 30 yrs 5 yrs longer
Power density 214.9 Wp/m² 225.5 Wp/m² 10.6 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 610 Wp 640 Wp 30 W more power
Weight 32.5 kg 36.8 kg 4.3 kg lighter
Product warranty 20 yrs 30 yrs 10 yrs longer
Weight per kWp 53.3 kg/kWp 57.5 kg/kWp 4.2 kg/kWp lighter
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.240 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
REC610AA PRO M
20,725 kWh
REC640AA Pro MG
21,744 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,019 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario REC610AA PRO M REC640AA Pro MG
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 610 W 640 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 96.4% of rated power 588 W 617 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 92.8% of rated power 566 W 594 W
Hot roof 70 °C 89.2% of rated power 544 W 571 W
03

Full specification

Parameter REC610AA PRO M REC640AA Pro MG Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 610 Wp 640 Wp +30 W for REC640AA Pro MG
Module efficiency 21.50 % 22.50 % +1.00 pp for REC640AA Pro MG
Power density 214.9 Wp/m² 225.5 Wp/m² +10.6 Wp/m² for REC640AA Pro MG
Open-circuit voltage 44.30 V 44.90 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 36.30 V 37.10 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 17.72 A 17.89 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 16.81 A 17.26 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.240 %/°C -0.240 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2175x1305x30 mm 2175x1305x30 mm Same
Module area 2.838 m² 2.838 m² Same
Weight 32.5 kg 36.8 kg -4.3 kg for REC610AA PRO M
Weight per kWp 53.3 kg/kWp 57.5 kg/kWp -4.2 kg/kWp for REC610AA PRO M
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 20 yrs 30 yrs +10 yrs for REC640AA Pro MG
Performance warranty 25 yrs 30 yrs +5 yrs for REC640AA Pro MG
Annual degradation 0.25 %/yr 0.25 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology HJT HJT Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 120 120 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#7,958 vs #4,222
REC640AA Pro MG leads by 3,736 places
Power density
#8,029 vs #3,889
REC640AA Pro MG leads by 4,140 places
Heat behaviour
#13 vs #13
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#7,135 vs #11,246
REC610AA PRO M leads by 4,111 places
Warranty
#9,798 vs #21
REC640AA Pro MG leads by 9,777 places
Overall
#3,978 vs #504
REC640AA Pro MG leads by 3,474 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
REC
REC REC610AA PRO M vs REC REC640AA PRO M
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
REC
REC REC610AA PRO M vs REC REC630AA PRO M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
REC
REC REC610AA PRO M vs REC REC620AA PRO M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
REC
REC REC610AA PRO M vs REC REC600AA PRO M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
REC
REC REC640AA Pro MG vs REC REC630AA Pro MG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
REC
REC REC640AA Pro MG vs REC REC620AA Pro MG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: REC REC610AA PRO M or REC REC640AA Pro MG?
According to our database: REC REC640AA Pro MG has higher module efficiency (22.50% vs 21.50%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of REC REC610AA PRO M and REC REC640AA Pro MG?
REC REC610AA PRO M has a module efficiency of 21.50%, while REC REC640AA Pro MG is 22.50%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does REC REC610AA PRO M use vs REC REC640AA Pro MG?
REC REC610AA PRO M uses HJT cells; REC REC640AA Pro MG uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on REC REC610AA PRO M and REC REC640AA Pro MG?
REC REC610AA PRO M has a 25 years power warranty; REC REC640AA Pro MG has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are REC REC610AA PRO M and REC REC640AA Pro MG bifacial panels?
Both REC REC610AA PRO M and REC REC640AA Pro MG are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 7 REC offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.