Skip to main content
REC600AA Pro MG vs REC620AA Pro MG 16 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

REC REC600AA Pro MG vs REC REC620AA Pro MG

REC REC600AA Pro MG
REC
REC600AA Pro MG
600 Wp 21.10 % HJT Bifacial
VS
REC REC620AA Pro MG
REC
REC620AA Pro MG
620 Wp 21.80 % HJT Bifacial
The verdict

REC620AA Pro MG leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.70 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
16 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

3 of 19 parameters
Parameter REC600AA Pro MG REC620AA Pro MG Difference
Module efficiency 21.10 % 21.80 % 0.70 pp more efficient
Power density 211.4 Wp/m² 218.4 Wp/m² 7.0 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 600 Wp 620 Wp 20 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.240 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
REC600AA Pro MG
20,385 kWh
REC620AA Pro MG
21,065 kWh
Lifetime gap
680 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario REC600AA Pro MG REC620AA Pro MG
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 600 W 620 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 96.4% of rated power 578 W 598 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 92.8% of rated power 557 W 575 W
Hot roof 70 °C 89.2% of rated power 535 W 553 W
03

Full specification

Parameter REC600AA Pro MG REC620AA Pro MG Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 600 Wp 620 Wp +20 W for REC620AA Pro MG
Module efficiency 21.10 % 21.80 % +0.70 pp for REC620AA Pro MG
Power density 211.4 Wp/m² 218.4 Wp/m² +7.0 Wp/m² for REC620AA Pro MG
Open-circuit voltage 44.20 V 44.60 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 36.00 V 36.60 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 17.45 A 17.67 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 16.67 A 16.94 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.240 %/°C -0.240 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2175x1305x30 mm 2175x1305x30 mm Same
Module area 2.838 m² 2.838 m² Same
Weight 36.8 kg 36.8 kg Same
Weight per kWp 61.3 kg/kWp 59.4 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.25 %/yr 0.25 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology HJT HJT Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 120 120 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#9,297 vs #7,022
REC620AA Pro MG leads by 2,275 places
Power density
#9,213 vs #6,952
REC620AA Pro MG leads by 2,261 places
Heat behaviour
#13 vs #13
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#12,630 vs #12,117
REC620AA Pro MG leads by 513 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#1,962 vs #1,182
REC620AA Pro MG leads by 780 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
REC
REC REC600AA Pro MG vs REC REC640AA Pro MG
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
REC
REC REC600AA Pro MG vs REC REC630AA Pro MG
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
REC
REC REC600AA Pro MG vs REC REC610AA Pro MG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
REC
REC REC600AA Pro MG vs REC REC590AA Pro MG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
REC
REC REC600AA Pro MG vs REC REC640AA PRO M
9 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
REC
REC REC600AA Pro MG vs REC REC630AA PRO M
7 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: REC REC600AA Pro MG or REC REC620AA Pro MG?
According to our database: REC REC620AA Pro MG has higher module efficiency (21.80% vs 21.10%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of REC REC600AA Pro MG and REC REC620AA Pro MG?
REC REC600AA Pro MG has a module efficiency of 21.10%, while REC REC620AA Pro MG is 21.80%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does REC REC600AA Pro MG use vs REC REC620AA Pro MG?
REC REC600AA Pro MG uses HJT cells; REC REC620AA Pro MG uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on REC REC600AA Pro MG and REC REC620AA Pro MG?
REC REC600AA Pro MG has a 30 years power warranty; REC REC620AA Pro MG has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are REC REC600AA Pro MG and REC REC620AA Pro MG bifacial panels?
Both REC REC600AA Pro MG and REC REC620AA Pro MG are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 7 REC offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.