REC REC Alpha Pure-RX 470 Wp vs REC REC460AA Pure-RX
VS
The verdict
REC Alpha Pure-RX 470 Wp leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.50 pp more efficient. 11 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 7 differencesHow alike are they
11
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
7 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
REC Alpha Pure-RX 470 Wp
REC460AA Pure-RX
Difference
Module efficiency
22.60 %
22.10 %
0.50 pp more efficient
Product warranty
25 yrs
20 yrs
5 yrs longer
Power density
226.0 Wp/m²
220.9 Wp/m²
5.1 Wp/m² higher
Annual degradation
0.33 %/yr
0.25 %/yr
0.08 %/yr slower
Rated power
470 Wp
460 Wp
10 W more power
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
Dimensions
1727x1204x31 mm
1728x1205x30 mm
1727x1204x31 mm vs 1728x1205x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.240 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
REC Alpha Pure-RX 470 Wp
16,108 kWh
REC460AA Pure-RX
15,628 kWh
Lifetime gap
480 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
REC Alpha Pure-RX 470 Wp
REC460AA Pure-RX
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
470 W
460 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
96.4% of rated power
453 W
443 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
92.8% of rated power
436 W
427 W
Hot roof
70 °C
89.2% of rated power
419 W
410 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
REC Alpha Pure-RX 470 Wp
REC460AA Pure-RX
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
470 Wp
460 Wp
+10 W for REC Alpha Pure-RX 470 Wp
Module efficiency
22.60 %
22.10 %
+0.50 pp for REC Alpha Pure-RX 470 Wp
Power density
226.0 Wp/m²
220.9 Wp/m²
+5.1 Wp/m² for REC Alpha Pure-RX 470 Wp
Open-circuit voltage
65.70 V
65.70 V
Same
Voltage at max power
55.40 V
54.90 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
8.95 A
8.88 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
8.49 A
8.38 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.240 %/°C
-0.240 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
1727x1204x31 mm
1728x1205x30 mm
1727x1204x31 mm vs 1728x1205x30 mm
Module area
2.079 m²
2.082 m²
Effectively the same
Weight
23.4 kg
22.7 kg
Effectively the same
Weight per kWp
49.8 kg/kWp
49.3 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
25 yrs
20 yrs
+5 yrs for REC Alpha Pure-RX 470 Wp
Performance warranty
25 yrs
25 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.33 %/yr
0.25 %/yr
-0.08 %/yr for REC460AA Pure-RX
Technology
Cell technology
HJT
HJT
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
-
88
Not published by REC
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#3,658
vs
#6,012
REC Alpha Pure-RX 470 Wp leads by 2,354 places
Power density
#3,709
vs
#6,007
REC Alpha Pure-RX 470 Wp leads by 2,298 places
Heat behaviour
#13
vs
#13
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#3,227
vs
#2,871
REC460AA Pure-RX leads by 356 places
Warranty
#9,798
vs
#9,798
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#6,413
vs
#8,585
REC Alpha Pure-RX 470 Wp leads by 2,172 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
REC
REC REC Alpha Pure-RX 470 Wp vs REC REC475AA Pure-RX
5 differences, the largest is product warranty
Same series, other bin
REC
REC REC Alpha Pure-RX 470 Wp vs REC REC470AA Pure-RX
4 differences, the largest is product warranty
Same series, other bin
REC
REC REC Alpha Pure-RX 470 Wp vs REC REC Alpha Pure-RX 470
2 differences, the largest is annual degradation
Same series, other bin
REC
REC REC Alpha Pure-RX 470 Wp vs REC REC465AA Pure-RX
5 differences, the largest is product warranty
Same series, other bin
REC
REC REC Alpha Pure-RX 470 Wp vs REC REC455AA Pure-RX
7 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
REC
REC REC Alpha Pure-RX 470 Wp vs REC REC450AA Pure-RX
8 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: REC REC Alpha Pure-RX 470 Wp or REC REC460AA Pure-RX?
According to our database: REC REC Alpha Pure-RX 470 Wp has higher module efficiency (22.60% vs 22.10%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of REC REC Alpha Pure-RX 470 Wp and REC REC460AA Pure-RX?
REC REC Alpha Pure-RX 470 Wp has a module efficiency of 22.60%, while REC REC460AA Pure-RX is 22.10%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does REC REC Alpha Pure-RX 470 Wp use vs REC REC460AA Pure-RX?
REC REC Alpha Pure-RX 470 Wp uses HJT cells; REC REC460AA Pure-RX uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on REC REC Alpha Pure-RX 470 Wp and REC REC460AA Pure-RX?
REC REC Alpha Pure-RX 470 Wp has a 25 years power warranty; REC REC460AA Pure-RX has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are REC REC Alpha Pure-RX 470 Wp and REC REC460AA Pure-RX bifacial panels?
REC REC460AA Pure-RX is bifacial (captures light from both faces); REC REC Alpha Pure-RX 470 Wp is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 7 REC offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.
