Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO XL-G11S.3 / BFG 605 vs Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 585
VS
The verdict
XL-G11S.3 / BFG 605 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.70 pp more efficient. 13 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 5 differencesHow alike are they
13
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
5 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
XL-G11S.3 / BFG 605
RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 585
Difference
Module efficiency
21.70 %
21.00 %
0.70 pp more efficient
Power density
216.7 Wp/m²
209.5 Wp/m²
7.2 Wp/m² higher
Rated power
605 Wp
585 Wp
20 W more power
Weight per kWp
57.7 kg/kWp
62.2 kg/kWp
4.5 kg/kWp lighter
Weight
34.9 kg
36.4 kg
1.5 kg lighter
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.340 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
XL-G11S.3 / BFG 605
19,923 kWh
RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 585
19,265 kWh
Lifetime gap
658 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
XL-G11S.3 / BFG 605
RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 585
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
605 W
585 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.9% of rated power
574 W
555 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
89.8% of rated power
543 W
525 W
Hot roof
70 °C
84.7% of rated power
512 W
495 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
XL-G11S.3 / BFG 605
RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 585
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
605 Wp
585 Wp
+20 W for XL-G11S.3 / BFG 605
Module efficiency
21.70 %
21.00 %
+0.70 pp for XL-G11S.3 / BFG 605
Power density
216.7 Wp/m²
209.5 Wp/m²
+7.2 Wp/m² for XL-G11S.3 / BFG 605
Open-circuit voltage
53.69 V
53.57 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
45.40 V
44.75 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
13.90 A
13.72 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
13.33 A
13.07 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.340 %/°C
-0.340 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2462x1134x35 mm
2462x1134x35 mm
Same
Module area
2.792 m²
2.792 m²
Same
Weight
34.9 kg
36.4 kg
-1.5 kg for XL-G11S.3 / BFG 605
Weight per kWp
57.7 kg/kWp
62.2 kg/kWp
-4.5 kg/kWp for XL-G11S.3 / BFG 605
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
-
Not published by Q-Cells
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.45 %/yr
0.45 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
PERC
PERC
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
156
156
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#7,421
vs
#9,758
XL-G11S.3 / BFG 605 leads by 2,337 places
Power density
#7,537
vs
#9,941
XL-G11S.3 / BFG 605 leads by 2,404 places
Heat behaviour
#8,778
vs
#8,778
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#11,362
vs
#12,754
XL-G11S.3 / BFG 605 leads by 1,392 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#4,578
vs
#8,794
XL-G11S.3 / BFG 605 leads by 4,216 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO XL-G11S.3 / BFG 605 vs Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 600
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO XL-G11S.3 / BFG 605 vs Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO XL-G11S.3 / BFG 600
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO XL-G11S.3 / BFG 605 vs Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 595
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO XL-G11S.3 / BFG 605 vs Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO XL-G11S.3 / BFG 595
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO XL-G11S.3 / BFG 605 vs Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 590
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO XL-G11S.3 / BFG 605 vs Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO XL-G11S.3 / BFG 590
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO XL-G11S.3 / BFG 605 or Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 585?
According to our database: Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO XL-G11S.3 / BFG 605 has higher module efficiency (21.70% vs 21.00%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO XL-G11S.3 / BFG 605 and Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 585?
Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO XL-G11S.3 / BFG 605 has a module efficiency of 21.70%, while Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 585 is 21.00%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO XL-G11S.3 / BFG 605 use vs Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 585?
Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO XL-G11S.3 / BFG 605 uses PERC cells; Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 585 uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO XL-G11S.3 / BFG 605 and Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 585?
Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO XL-G11S.3 / BFG 605 has a 30 years power warranty; Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 585 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO XL-G11S.3 / BFG 605 and Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 585 bifacial panels?
Both Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO XL-G11S.3 / BFG 605 and Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 585 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 25 Q-Cells offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.

