Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 595 vs Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670
VS
The verdict
ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is rated power: 75 W more power. 6 of 17 comparable parameters are identical, with 2 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish them.
See all 11 differencesHow alike are they
6
of 17 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
11 of 17 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 595
ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670
Difference
Rated power
595 Wp
670 Wp
75 W more power
Open-circuit voltage
53.63 V
45.72 V
7.91 V apart
Short-circuit current
13.77 A
18.42 A
4.65 A apart
Module area
2.792 m²
3.106 m²
0.314 m² apart
Module efficiency
21.30 %
21.60 %
0.30 pp more efficient
Weight per kWp
61.2 kg/kWp
57.0 kg/kWp
4.2 kg/kWp lighter
Weight
36.4 kg
38.2 kg
1.8 kg lighter
Voltage at max power
45.18 V
38.27 V
6.91 V apart
Current at max power
13.17 A
17.51 A
4.34 A apart
Cell count
156
132
24 cells apart
Dimensions
2462x1134x35 mm
2384x1303x35 mm
2462x1134x35 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.340 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 595
19,594 kWh
ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670
22,064 kWh
Lifetime gap
2,470 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 595
ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
595 W
670 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.9% of rated power
565 W
636 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
89.8% of rated power
534 W
602 W
Hot roof
70 °C
84.7% of rated power
504 W
567 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 595
ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
595 Wp
670 Wp
+75 W for ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670
Module efficiency
21.30 %
21.60 %
+0.30 pp for ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670
Power density
213.1 Wp/m²
215.7 Wp/m²
Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage
53.63 V
45.72 V
7.91 V apart
Voltage at max power
45.18 V
38.27 V
6.91 V apart
Short-circuit current
13.77 A
18.42 A
4.65 A apart
Current at max power
13.17 A
17.51 A
4.34 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.340 %/°C
-0.340 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2462x1134x35 mm
2384x1303x35 mm
2462x1134x35 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
Module area
2.792 m²
3.106 m²
0.314 m² apart
Weight
36.4 kg
38.2 kg
-1.8 kg for RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 595
Weight per kWp
61.2 kg/kWp
57.0 kg/kWp
-4.2 kg/kWp for ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
-
12 yrs
Not published by Q-Cells
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.45 %/yr
0.45 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
PERC
-
Not published by Q-Cells
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
156
132
24 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#8,519
vs
#7,652
ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670 leads by 867 places
Power density
#8,470
vs
#7,644
ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670 leads by 826 places
Heat behaviour
#8,778
vs
#8,778
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#12,610
vs
#11,008
ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670 leads by 1,602 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#8,061
vs
#2,462
ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670 leads by 5,599 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 595 vs Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 600
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 595 vs Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 590
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 595 vs Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 585
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670 vs Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670 vs Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670 vs Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 660
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 595 or Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670?
According to our database: Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670 has higher module efficiency (21.60% vs 21.30%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 595 and Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670?
Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 595 has a module efficiency of 21.30%, while Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670 is 21.60%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 595 use vs Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670?
Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 595 uses PERC cells; Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670 uses Monocrystalline. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 595 and Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670?
Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 595 has a 30 years power warranty; Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 595 and Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670 bifacial panels?
Both Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 595 and Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 20 Q-Cells offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.
