Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645 vs Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675
VS
The verdict
TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 1.40 pp more efficient. 5 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 13 differencesHow alike are they
5
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
13 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645
PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675
Difference
Module efficiency
23.10 %
21.70 %
1.40 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.340 %/°C
0.050 %/°C better in heat
Power density
231.0 Wp/m²
217.3 Wp/m²
13.7 Wp/m² higher
Rated power
645 Wp
675 Wp
30 W more power
Annual degradation
0.33 %/yr
0.45 %/yr
0.12 %/yr slower
Weight
35.4 kg
38.2 kg
2.8 kg lighter
Open-circuit voltage
58.07 V
45.74 V
12.33 V apart
Short-circuit current
14.05 A
18.45 A
4.40 A apart
Module area
2.792 m²
3.106 m²
0.314 m² apart
Voltage at max power
48.47 V
38.43 V
10.04 V apart
Current at max power
13.31 A
17.56 A
4.25 A apart
Cell count
156
132
24 cells apart
Dimensions
2462x1134x35 mm
2384x1303x35 mm
2462x1134x35 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645
21,761 kWh
PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675
22,228 kWh
Lifetime gap
467 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645
PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
645 W
675 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.9% of rated power
617 W
641 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
89.8% of rated power
589 W
606 W
Hot roof
70 °C
84.7% of rated power
561 W
572 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645
PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
645 Wp
675 Wp
+30 W for PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675
Module efficiency
23.10 %
21.70 %
+1.40 pp for TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645
Power density
231.0 Wp/m²
217.3 Wp/m²
+13.7 Wp/m² for TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645
Open-circuit voltage
58.07 V
45.74 V
12.33 V apart
Voltage at max power
48.47 V
38.43 V
10.04 V apart
Short-circuit current
14.05 A
18.45 A
4.40 A apart
Current at max power
13.31 A
17.56 A
4.25 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.340 %/°C
+0.050 %/°C for TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645
Mechanical
Dimensions
2462x1134x35 mm
2384x1303x35 mm
2462x1134x35 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
Module area
2.792 m²
3.106 m²
0.314 m² apart
Weight
35.4 kg
38.2 kg
-2.8 kg for TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645
Weight per kWp
54.9 kg/kWp
56.6 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.33 %/yr
0.45 %/yr
-0.12 %/yr for TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645
Technology
Cell technology
N-type
-
Not published by Q-Cells
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
156
132
24 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#1,570
vs
#7,421
TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645 leads by 5,851 places
Power density
#1,629
vs
#7,349
TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645 leads by 5,720 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165
vs
#8,778
TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645 leads by 6,613 places
Weight
#9,271
vs
#10,738
TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645 leads by 1,467 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#1,826
vs
#2,198
TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645 leads by 372 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645 vs Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 640
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645 vs Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645 vs Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645 vs Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 625
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645 vs Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 620
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645 vs Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 615
7 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645 or Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675?
According to our database: Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645 has higher module efficiency (23.10% vs 21.70%); Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.290%/°C vs -0.340%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645 and Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675?
Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645 has a module efficiency of 23.10%, while Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675 is 21.70%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645 use vs Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675?
Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645 uses N-type cells; Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675 uses Monocrystalline. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645 and Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675?
Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645 has a 30 years power warranty; Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645 and Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675 bifacial panels?
Both Q-Cells Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645 and Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 17 Q-Cells offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.
