Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675 vs Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 595
VS
The verdict
ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is rated power: 80 W more power. 5 of 17 comparable parameters are identical, with 2 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish them.
See all 12 differencesHow alike are they
5
of 17 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
12 of 17 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675
RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 595
Difference
Rated power
675 Wp
595 Wp
80 W more power
Module efficiency
21.70 %
21.30 %
0.40 pp more efficient
Open-circuit voltage
45.74 V
53.63 V
7.89 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.45 A
13.77 A
4.68 A apart
Module area
3.106 m²
2.792 m²
0.314 m² apart
Weight per kWp
56.6 kg/kWp
61.2 kg/kWp
4.6 kg/kWp lighter
Power density
217.3 Wp/m²
213.1 Wp/m²
4.2 Wp/m² higher
Weight
38.2 kg
36.4 kg
1.8 kg lighter
Voltage at max power
38.43 V
45.18 V
6.75 V apart
Current at max power
17.56 A
13.17 A
4.39 A apart
Cell count
132
156
24 cells apart
Dimensions
2384x1303x35 mm
2462x1134x35 mm
2384x1303x35 mm vs 2462x1134x35 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.340 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675
22,228 kWh
RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 595
19,594 kWh
Lifetime gap
2,634 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675
RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 595
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
675 W
595 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.9% of rated power
641 W
565 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
89.8% of rated power
606 W
534 W
Hot roof
70 °C
84.7% of rated power
572 W
504 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675
RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 595
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
675 Wp
595 Wp
+80 W for ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675
Module efficiency
21.70 %
21.30 %
+0.40 pp for ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675
Power density
217.3 Wp/m²
213.1 Wp/m²
+4.2 Wp/m² for ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675
Open-circuit voltage
45.74 V
53.63 V
7.89 V apart
Voltage at max power
38.43 V
45.18 V
6.75 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.45 A
13.77 A
4.68 A apart
Current at max power
17.56 A
13.17 A
4.39 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.340 %/°C
-0.340 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x35 mm
2462x1134x35 mm
2384x1303x35 mm vs 2462x1134x35 mm
Module area
3.106 m²
2.792 m²
0.314 m² apart
Weight
38.2 kg
36.4 kg
-1.8 kg for RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 595
Weight per kWp
56.6 kg/kWp
61.2 kg/kWp
-4.6 kg/kWp for ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
-
Not published by Q-Cells
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.45 %/yr
0.45 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
-
PERC
Not published by Q-Cells
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
156
24 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#7,421
vs
#8,519
ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675 leads by 1,098 places
Power density
#7,349
vs
#8,470
ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675 leads by 1,121 places
Heat behaviour
#8,778
vs
#8,778
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#10,738
vs
#12,610
ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675 leads by 1,872 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#2,198
vs
#8,061
ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675 leads by 5,863 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675 vs Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675 vs Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675 vs Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 660
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675 vs Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 655
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675 vs Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 650
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 595 vs Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 600
One difference: module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675 or Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 595?
According to our database: Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675 has higher module efficiency (21.70% vs 21.30%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675 and Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 595?
Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675 has a module efficiency of 21.70%, while Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 595 is 21.30%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675 use vs Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 595?
Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675 uses Monocrystalline cells; Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 595 uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675 and Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 595?
Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675 has a 30 years power warranty; Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 595 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675 and Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 595 bifacial panels?
Both Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675 and Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 595 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 25 Q-Cells offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.
