Skip to main content
ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670 vs RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 600 7 of 17 identical Swap Change panels

Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670 vs Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 600

Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670
670 Wp 21.60 % Bifacial
VS
Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 600
Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 600
600 Wp 21.50 % PERC Bifacial
The verdict

ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is rated power: 70 W more power. 7 of 17 comparable parameters are identical, with 2 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish them.

See all 10 differences
How alike are they
7 of 17 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

10 of 17 parameters
Parameter ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670 RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 600 Difference
Rated power 670 Wp 600 Wp 70 W more power
Open-circuit voltage 45.72 V 53.66 V 7.94 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.42 A 13.80 A 4.62 A apart
Module area 3.106 m² 2.792 m² 0.314 m² apart
Weight per kWp 57.0 kg/kWp 60.7 kg/kWp 3.7 kg/kWp lighter
Weight 38.2 kg 36.4 kg 1.8 kg lighter
Voltage at max power 38.27 V 45.39 V 7.12 V apart
Current at max power 17.51 A 13.22 A 4.29 A apart
Cell count 132 156 24 cells apart
Dimensions 2384x1303x35 mm 2462x1134x35 mm 2384x1303x35 mm vs 2462x1134x35 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.340 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670
22,064 kWh
RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 600
19,759 kWh
Lifetime gap
2,305 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670 RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 600
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 670 W 600 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.9% of rated power 636 W 569 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 89.8% of rated power 602 W 539 W
Hot roof 70 °C 84.7% of rated power 567 W 508 W
03

Full specification

Parameter ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670 RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 600 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 670 Wp 600 Wp +70 W for ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670
Module efficiency 21.60 % 21.50 % Effectively the same
Power density 215.7 Wp/m² 214.9 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 45.72 V 53.66 V 7.94 V apart
Voltage at max power 38.27 V 45.39 V 7.12 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.42 A 13.80 A 4.62 A apart
Current at max power 17.51 A 13.22 A 4.29 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.340 %/°C -0.340 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x35 mm 2462x1134x35 mm 2384x1303x35 mm vs 2462x1134x35 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 2.792 m² 0.314 m² apart
Weight 38.2 kg 36.4 kg -1.8 kg for RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 600
Weight per kWp 57.0 kg/kWp 60.7 kg/kWp -3.7 kg/kWp for ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs - Not published by Q-Cells
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.45 %/yr 0.45 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology - PERC Not published by Q-Cells
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 156 24 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#7,652 vs #7,958
ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670 leads by 306 places
Power density
#7,644 vs #8,031
ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670 leads by 387 places
Heat behaviour
#8,778 vs #8,778
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#11,008 vs #12,510
ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670 leads by 1,502 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#2,462 vs #7,604
ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670 leads by 5,142 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670 vs Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670 vs Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670 vs Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 660
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670 vs Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 655
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670 vs Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 650
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 600 vs Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 595
One difference: module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670 or Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 600?
According to our database: Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670 has higher module efficiency (21.60% vs 21.50%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670 and Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 600?
Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670 has a module efficiency of 21.60%, while Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 600 is 21.50%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670 use vs Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 600?
Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670 uses Monocrystalline cells; Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 600 uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670 and Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 600?
Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670 has a 30 years power warranty; Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 600 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670 and Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 600 bifacial panels?
Both Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670 and Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 600 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 25 Q-Cells offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.