Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665 vs Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 590
VS
The verdict
ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is rated power: 75 W more power. 6 of 17 comparable parameters are identical, with 2 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish them.
See all 11 differencesHow alike are they
6
of 17 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
11 of 17 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665
RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 590
Difference
Rated power
665 Wp
590 Wp
75 W more power
Open-circuit voltage
45.70 V
53.60 V
7.90 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.39 A
13.74 A
4.65 A apart
Module area
3.106 m²
2.792 m²
0.314 m² apart
Module efficiency
21.40 %
21.10 %
0.30 pp more efficient
Weight per kWp
57.4 kg/kWp
61.7 kg/kWp
4.3 kg/kWp lighter
Weight
38.2 kg
36.4 kg
1.8 kg lighter
Voltage at max power
38.11 V
44.96 V
6.85 V apart
Current at max power
17.45 A
13.12 A
4.33 A apart
Cell count
132
156
24 cells apart
Dimensions
2384x1303x35 mm
2462x1134x35 mm
2384x1303x35 mm vs 2462x1134x35 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.340 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665
21,899 kWh
RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 590
19,429 kWh
Lifetime gap
2,470 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665
RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 590
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
665 W
590 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.9% of rated power
631 W
560 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
89.8% of rated power
597 W
530 W
Hot roof
70 °C
84.7% of rated power
563 W
500 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665
RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 590
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
665 Wp
590 Wp
+75 W for ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665
Module efficiency
21.40 %
21.10 %
+0.30 pp for ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665
Power density
214.1 Wp/m²
211.3 Wp/m²
Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage
45.70 V
53.60 V
7.90 V apart
Voltage at max power
38.11 V
44.96 V
6.85 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.39 A
13.74 A
4.65 A apart
Current at max power
17.45 A
13.12 A
4.33 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.340 %/°C
-0.340 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x35 mm
2462x1134x35 mm
2384x1303x35 mm vs 2462x1134x35 mm
Module area
3.106 m²
2.792 m²
0.314 m² apart
Weight
38.2 kg
36.4 kg
-1.8 kg for RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 590
Weight per kWp
57.4 kg/kWp
61.7 kg/kWp
-4.3 kg/kWp for ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
-
Not published by Q-Cells
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.45 %/yr
0.45 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
-
PERC
Not published by Q-Cells
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
156
24 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#8,323
vs
#9,297
ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665 leads by 974 places
Power density
#8,250
vs
#9,241
ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665 leads by 991 places
Heat behaviour
#8,778
vs
#8,778
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#11,217
vs
#12,677
ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665 leads by 1,460 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#2,833
vs
#8,523
ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665 leads by 5,690 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665 vs Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665 vs Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665 vs Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 660
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665 vs Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 655
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665 vs Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 650
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 590 vs Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 600
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665 or Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 590?
According to our database: Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665 has higher module efficiency (21.40% vs 21.10%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665 and Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 590?
Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665 has a module efficiency of 21.40%, while Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 590 is 21.10%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665 use vs Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 590?
Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665 uses Monocrystalline cells; Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 590 uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665 and Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 590?
Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665 has a 30 years power warranty; Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 590 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665 and Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 590 bifacial panels?
Both Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665 and Q-Cells Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 590 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 25 Q-Cells offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.
